Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 May;30(3):195-202.
doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000585.

Revisiting Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Tears in Knees With Mild or No Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Seung Hoon Lee  1 , O-Sung Lee, Sung Taeck Kim, Yong Seuk Lee
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Revisiting Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Tears in Knees With Mild or No Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Seung Hoon Lee et al. Clin J Sport Med. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for symptomatic degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) in knees with mild or no osteoarthritis.

Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) English language; (2) randomized controlled trial (RCT); (3) comparison between APM and other treatment modalities as a primary objective; and (4) complete DMT in knees with mild or no osteoarthritis. Mild or no arthritis was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0 to 2 or Ahlbäck 0 to 1 on radiography. Statistical analysis of functional activity and pain after APM and conservative treatment or sham operation was performed using R version 3.3.1.

Results: Five articles were included in the final analysis, and they were all RCTs. Four studies compared clinical results of APM with those for physical therapy, and one study compared APM with sham operation. The functional activity was not better in the APM group (296 cases) than in the conservative treatment or sham operation group (284 cases) (I: 0%, small level of heterogeneity). Pain was not reduced significantly in the APM group compared with that in the conservative treatment or sham operation group (I: 0∼90%, high level of heterogeneity).

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality literature provides relatively strong evidence that APM did not improve functional activity or reduce pain compared with the results with conservative treatment or sham operation in knees with mild or no osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kim S, Bosque J, Meehan JP, et al. Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of national surveys of ambulatory surgery, 1996 and 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:994–1000.
    1. van de Graaf VA, Wolterbeek N, Mutsaerts EL, et al. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or conservative treatment for nonobstructive meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1855–1865. e1854.
    1. Katz J, Brophy R, Chaisson C, et al. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1675–1684.
    1. Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1097–1107.
    1. Sihvonen R, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, et al. Mechanical symptoms as an indication for knee arthroscopy in patients with degenerative meniscus tear: a prospective cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24:1367–1375.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources