Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):662-666.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.16.

A Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice"

Affiliations
Comment

A Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice"

Mark Sujan. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

In their recent editorial Mannion and Braithwaite provide an insightful critique of traditional patient safety improvement efforts, and offer a powerful alternative vision based on Safety-II thinking that has the potential to radically transform the way we approach patient safety. In this commentary, I explore how the Safety-II perspective points to new directions for organisational learning in healthcare organisations. Current approaches to organisational learning adopted by healthcare organisations have had limited success in improving patient safety. I argue that these approaches learn about the wrong things, and in the wrong way. I conclude that organisational learning in healthcare organisations should provide deeper understanding of the adaptations healthcare workers make in their everyday clinical work, and that learning and improvement approaches should be more democratic by promoting participation and ownership among a broader range of stakeholders as well as patients.

Keywords: Organisational Learning; Patient Safety; Resilience Engineering; Safety-II; Work-As-Done.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Mannion R, Braithwaite J. False dawns and new horizons in patient safety research and practice. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(12):685–689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollnagel E. Is safety a subject for science? Saf Sci. 2014;67:21–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025. - DOI
    1. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2006.
    1. Martinie C, Palanque P, Ragosta M, Sujan MA, Navarre D, Pasquini A. Understanding functional resonance through a federation of models: preliminary findings of an avionics case study. In: Bitsch F, Guiochet J, Kaâniche M, eds. Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: 32nd International Conference, SAFECOMP 2013, Toulouse, France, September 24-27, 2013. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013:216-227.
    1. Braithwaite J, Wears RL, Hollnagel E. Resilient Health Care, Volume 3: Reconciling Work-as-Imagined and Work-as-Done. Farnham: Ashgate; 2016.

LinkOut - more resources