Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 12;16(1):105.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1097-4.

Translating evidence to patient care through caregivers: a systematic review of caregiver-mediated interventions

Kirsten M Fiest  1 , Christiane Job McIntosh  2 , Danielle Demiantschuk  2 , Jeanna Parsons Leigh  3 , Henry T Stelfox  4
Affiliations

Translating evidence to patient care through caregivers: a systematic review of caregiver-mediated interventions

Kirsten M Fiest et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Caregivers may promote the uptake of science into patient care and the practice of evidence-informed medicine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether caregiver-mediated (non-clinical caregiver-delivered) interventions are effective in improving patient, caregiver, provider, or health system outcomes.

Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus databases from inception to February 27, 2017. Interventions (with a comparison group) reporting on a quality improvement intervention mediated by a caregiver and directed to a patient, in all ages and patient-care settings, were selected for inclusion. A three-category framework was developed to characterize caregiver-mediated interventions: inform (e.g., provide knowledge), activate (e.g., prompt action), and collaborate (e.g., lead to interaction between caregivers and other groups [e.g., care providers]).

Results: Fifty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, and 64% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The most commonly assessed outcomes were patient- (n = 40) and caregiver-oriented (n = 33); few health system- (n = 10) and provider-oriented (n = 2) outcomes were reported. Patient outcomes (e.g., satisfaction) were most improved by caregiver-mediated interventions that provided condition and treatment education (e.g., symptom management information) and practical condition-management support (e.g., practicing medication protocol). Caregiver outcomes (e.g., stress-related/psychiatric outcomes) were most improved by interventions that activated caregiver roles (e.g., monitoring blood glucose) and provided information related to that action (e.g., why and how to monitor). The risk of bias was generally high, and the overall quality of the evidence was low-moderate, based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation ratings.

Conclusions: There is a large body of research, including many RCTs, to support the use of caregiver-mediated interventions that inform and activate caregivers to improve patient and caregiver outcomes. Select caregiver-mediated interventions improve patient (inform-activate) and caregiver (inform-activate-collaborate) outcomes and should be considered by all researchers implementing patient- and family-oriented research.

Systematic review: PROSPERO, CRD42016052509 .

Keywords: Caregiver-mediated; Implementation science; Intervention; Knowledge translation; Quality improvement; Review; Systematic review; Translational medical research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conceptual framework derived from synthesis of data
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Li H, Melnyk BM, McCann R, Chatcheydang J, Koulouglioti C, Nichols LW, Lee MD, Ghassemi A. Creating avenues for relative empowerment (CARE): a pilot test of an intervention to improve outcomes of hospitalized elders and family caregivers. Res Nurs Health. 2003;26(4):284–299. doi: 10.1002/nur.10091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitchell M, Chaboyer W, Burmeister E, Foster M. Positive effects of a nursing intervention on family-centered care in adult critical care. Am J Crit Care. 2009;18(6):543–552. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009226. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gasparini R, Champagne M, Stephany A, Hudson J, Fuchs MA. Policy to practice: increased family presence and the impact on patient- and family-centered care adoption. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(1):28–34. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000152. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauman G, Watling CJ, Hahn K. Oncologists’ attitudes towards patient and family-centered care. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29_suppl):111. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.51. - DOI
    1. Baird J, Davies B, Hinds PS, Baggott C, Rehm RS. What impact do hospital and unit-based rules have upon patient and family-centered care in the pediatric intensive care unit? J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30(1):133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.10.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources