Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Summer;24(3):275-287.
doi: 10.1310/sci2403-275.

Nerve and Tendon Transfer Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Individualized Choices to Optimize Function

Affiliations
Review

Nerve and Tendon Transfer Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Individualized Choices to Optimize Function

Ida K Fox et al. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer.

Abstract

Background: Recent adaption of nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity function in cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is an exciting development. Tendon transfer procedures are well established, reliable, and can significantly improve function. Despite this, few eligible surgical candidates in the United States undergo these restorative surgeries. Evidence Acquisition: The literature on these procedures was reviewed. Results: Options to improve function include surgery to restore elbow extension, wrist extension, and hand opening and closing function. Tendon transfers are reliable and well tolerated but require weeks of immobilization and limits on extremity use. The role of nerve transfers is still being established. Early results indicate variable return of meaningful function with less immobilization but longer periods (up to years) required to gain appreciable function. Conclusion: Nerve and tendon transfer surgery sacrifice an expendable donor to restore a missing and more critical function. These procedures are well described in hand surgery; are reliable, well tolerated, and covered by insurance; and should be part of the SCI rehabilitation discussion.

Keywords: nerve transfer; spinal cord injury; tendon transfer; tetraplegia; upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
This illustration depicts the underlying physiology of nerve transfer surgery in the setting of cervical spinal cord injury. (A) In this SCI scenario, the lower motor neuron (LMN) is intact and the peripheral nerve transfer procedure can work to re-route expendable donors under volitional control to nonfunctional recipients. (B) If there is a more extensive LMN zone of injury, the nerve transfer must be done soon (<1 year post SCI) to restore both volitional control and LMN integrity. © 2014 Washington University in St. Louis, nervesurgery.wustl.edu. Used with permission.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Tendon transfer surgery photo that depicts the freeing up of a donor tendon. Note that an extensive zone of dissection is required to free up the tendon and attach sutures to it. The donor tendon is subsequently sewn to the recipient.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Nerve transfer surgery photos. (A) The dissection to identify the donor and recipient nerve branches. (B) The donor and recipient nerve branches have been coapted without tendon. © 2014 Washington University in St. Louis, nervesurgery.wustl.edu. Used with permission.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
This schematic depicts the characteristics of nerve and tendon transfer and factors that might influence individual preferences for one procedure over another. On the left hand side of the schematic are nerve transfers and on the right are tendon transfers. The choice of one procedure over the other will depend on the individual's priorities and preferences, the findings of the clinical evaluation, and a discussion of goals.

References

    1. Anderson KD, Friden J, Lieber RL. Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(4):334–338. - PubMed
    1. Zlotolow DA. The role of the upper extremity surgeon in the management of tetraplegia. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(5):929–935. quiz 935. - PubMed
    1. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(10):1371–1383. - PubMed
    1. Freehafer AA, Mast WA. Transfer of the brachioradialis to improve wrist extension in high spinal-cord injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49(4):648–652. - PubMed
    1. House JH, Gwathmey FW, Lundsgaard DK. Restoration of strong grasp and lateral pinch in tetraplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury. J Hand Surg Am. 1976;1(2):152–159. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources