Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun;7(3):316-324.
doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.05.03.

Autologous reconstruction following nipple sparing mastectomy: a comprehensive review of the current literature

Affiliations
Review

Autologous reconstruction following nipple sparing mastectomy: a comprehensive review of the current literature

Paul Shay et al. Gland Surg. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

As surgical methods continue to evolve and patients become more educated consumers of their medical care, both oncologic breast surgeons and reconstructive plastic surgeons should understand the current options for surgical management of breast cancer. This review evaluates the current autologous breast reconstruction options following nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). A comprehensive review of the current literature discussing autologous reconstruction after NSM was performed. Fat grafting alone has been used to reconstruct small to medium sized-breasts over multiple injection sessions. Goldilocks mastectomy-like reconstructions can be used for larger, more ptotic breasts. Pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps can be used, but usually need to be modified to ensure sufficient breast volume. While the lower abdominal tissue remains the most common donor site in free tissue transfer, other donor sites can be used if there is insufficient volume or inadequate perforators. Periareolar incisions are associated with the highest rates of overall complications and nipple areola complex necrosis. It has not been determined whether implant-based or autologous reconstructions have lower complication rates. Both prior radiation and large, ptotic breasts present unique challenges during reconstruction. Overall, there is a high rate of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction following NSM. Autologous breast reconstruction after NSM is a safe method of breast cancer surgical management with aesthetically excellent results. Multiple techniques have been described along the reconstructive ladder. Special consideration should be given to choices of incision, previously irradiated breasts, and large, ptotic breasts.

Keywords: Mastectomy; nipples; surgical flaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection process of peer-reviewed articles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cooper WA. The history of radical mastectomy. Ann Med Hist 1941;3:36-54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donegan WL. Introduction to the history of breast cancer. Cancer of the Breast. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995.
    1. Halsted WS. The Results of Operations for the Cure of Cancer of the Breast Performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg 1894;20:497-555. 10.1097/00000658-189407000-00075 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U, et al. Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women with Breast Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2017;225:361-5. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verneuil A. Memoires de chirurgie, Paris, 1887.