Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 May 29:25:56-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2018.05.012. eCollection 2018 Aug.

Pelvic exenteration by robotically-assisted laparoscopy: A feasibility series of 6 cases

Affiliations
Case Reports

Pelvic exenteration by robotically-assisted laparoscopy: A feasibility series of 6 cases

Huyên-Thu Nguyen Xuan et al. Gynecol Oncol Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

After concomitant chemo-radiation therapy, 20 to 30% of advanced cervical cancers recur in irradiated territory. Pelvic exenteration remains a therapeutic option for selected patients. However, this procedure remains complex because of tissue fragility after radiotherapy and their associated co-morbidities. Minimally invasive surgery such as robotically assisted laparoscopy may overcome these surgical challenges. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of pelvic exenteration with robotically assisted laparoscopy. Patients who underwent this procedure between 2015 and 2016 were included. Patients characteristics, treatment indication, intraoperative events, immediate and late complications, and histological outcomes were recorded. The data of 6 patients were analyzed. The primary cancer staging ranged from IB1 to IIB. All cases were loco-regional recurrence and 2 cases presented with with vesico-vaginal fistula. All patients had a history of pelvic irradiation. The mean operative time was 6.7 h. No complications occurred during surgery. The average hospital stay was 11.5 days. Immediate complications were mostly represented by urinary tract infections (4/5). Histological margins were clear in 67% (4/6), and a focal involvement was found in 33% (2/6) of cases. Late complications occurred within 82 days on average and included stenosis of ileal anastomosis, wound infection, acute renal failure, and pulmonary embolism. Revision surgery was necessary in 2 cases. There were 3 local recurrences occurring within an average of 215 days. In the light of these results, pelvic exenteration by robotically assisted laparoscopy may represent a valuable treatment modality of recurrent cervical cancer with low immediate postoperative morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chiantera V., Rossi M., De Iaco P., Koehler C., Marnitz S., Fagotti A. Morbidity after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a retrospective multicentric study of 230 patients. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2014;24(1):156–164. (janv) - PubMed
    1. Chiantera V., Rossi M., De Iaco P., Koehler C., Marnitz S., Ferrandina G. Survival after curative pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective multicentric study of 167 patients. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2014;24(5):916–922. (juin) - PubMed
    1. Fact Sheets by Population [Internet] http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx [cité 17 mai 2018]. Disponible sur.
    1. Ferron G., Martel P. Querleu D. [vaginal reconstruction after pelvic exenteration: when and which techniques?] Bull. Cancer (Paris) 2003;90(5):435–440. (mai) - PubMed
    1. Iavazzo C., Gkegkes I.D. Robotic technology for pelvic exenteration in cases of cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2014;125(1):15–17. (avr) - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources