Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers
- PMID: 30002146
- PMCID: PMC6225795
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007525
Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers
Abstract
Background: Little is known about patient/family comfort voicing care concerns in real time, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU) where stakes are high and time is compressed. Experts advocate patient and family engagement in safety, which will require that patients/families be able to voice concerns. Data on patient/family attitudes and experiences regarding speaking up are sparse, and mostly include reporting events retrospectively, rather than pre-emptively, to try to prevent harm. We aimed to (1) assess patient/family comfort speaking up about common ICU concerns; (2) identify patient/family-perceived barriers to speaking up; and (3) explore factors associated with patient/family comfort speaking up.
Methods: In collaboration with patients/families, we developed a survey to evaluate speaking up attitudes and behaviours. We surveyed current ICU families in person at an urban US academic medical centre, supplemented with a larger national internet sample of individuals with prior ICU experience.
Results: 105/125 (84%) of current families and 1050 internet panel participants with ICU history completed the surveys. Among the current ICU families, 50%-70% expressed hesitancy to voice concerns about possible mistakes, mismatched care goals, confusing/conflicting information and inadequate hand hygiene. Results among prior ICU participants were similar. Half of all respondents reported at least one barrier to voicing concerns, most commonly not wanting to be a 'troublemaker', 'team is too busy' or 'I don't know how'. Older, female participants and those with personal or family employment in healthcare were more likely to report comfort speaking up.
Conclusion: Speaking up may be challenging for ICU patients/families. Patient/family education about how to speak up and assurance that raising concerns will not create 'trouble' may help promote open discussions about care concerns and possible errors in the ICU.
Keywords: communication; critical care; patient safety; patient-centred care; safety culture.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Speaking up about traditional and professionalism-related patient safety threats: a national survey of interns and residents.BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):869-880. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006284. Epub 2017 Apr 25. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017. PMID: 28442609
-
Speak-up culture in an intensive care unit in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional survey exploring the communication openness perceptions of Chinese doctors and nurses.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e015721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015721. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28801406 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to Safety Event Reporting in an Academic Radiology Department: Authority Gradients and Other Human Factors.Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):693-698. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171625. Epub 2018 May 15. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29762092
-
Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 8;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-61. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 24507747 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventing Harm in the ICU-Building a Culture of Safety and Engaging Patients and Families.Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1531-1537. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002556. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28640023 Review.
Cited by
-
Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA: past, present, and future.Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jul;7(7):626-638. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30087-6. Epub 2019 May 20. Lancet Respir Med. 2019. PMID: 31122892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Empowering Patients With a Shared Communication Tool: A Patient-Oriented Multimethods Pilot Study.J Patient Exp. 2023 Mar 9;10:23743735231160421. doi: 10.1177/23743735231160421. eCollection 2023. J Patient Exp. 2023. PMID: 36923603 Free PMC article.
-
Family concerns in organ donor conversations: a qualitative embedded multiple-case study.Crit Care. 2024 Dec 27;28(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05198-2. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39731096 Free PMC article.
-
Care Beyond Cure: Humanizing the Intensive Care Unit Journey.Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):901-902. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24822. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39411294 Free PMC article.
-
Informatics opportunities to involve patients in hospital safety: a conceptual model.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):202-211. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz167. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31578546 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The National Patient Safety Foundation’s Lucian Leape Institute. Safety is personal: partnering with patients and families for the safest care. Boston: National patient safety foundation. 2014. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.npsf.org/resource/resmgr/LLI/Safety_Is_Pers... (accessed 15 Mar 2017).
-
- National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Diagnostic team members and tasks: improving patient engagement and health care professional education and training in diagnosis : Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2015:145–216. (accessed 20 Jan 2017).
-
- The National Patient Safety Foundation. RCA2: improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm (Version 2). 2016. http://www.npsf.org/?page=rca2 (accessed 20 Jan 2017).
-
- The National Patient Safety Foundation. National agenda for action: patients and families in patient safety nothing about me, without me. 2003. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.npsf.org/resource/collection/ABAB3CA8-4E0A-... (accessed 10 Jun 2017).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources