Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;118(10):2055-2063.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3926-8. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

Analysis of oxygen uptake efficiency parameters in young people with cystic fibrosis

Affiliations

Analysis of oxygen uptake efficiency parameters in young people with cystic fibrosis

Owen W Tomlinson et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: This study characterised oxygen uptake efficiency (OUE) in children with mild-to-moderate cystic fibrosis (CF). Specifically, it investigated (1) the utility of OUE parameters as potential submaximal surrogates of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), and (2) the relationship between OUE and disease severity.

Methods: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) data were collated from 72 children [36 CF, 36 age- and sex-matched controls (CON)], with OUE assessed as its highest 90-s average (plateau; OUEP), the gas exchange threshold (OUEGET) and respiratory compensation point (OUERCP). Pearson's correlation coefficients, independent t tests and factorial ANOVAs assessed differences between groups and the use of OUE measures as surrogates for [Formula: see text].

Results: A significant (p < 0.05) reduction in allometrically scaled [Formula: see text] and all OUE parameters was found in CF. Significant (p < 0.05) correlations between measurements of OUE and allometrically scaled [Formula: see text], were observed in CF (r = 0.49-0.52) and CON (r = 0.46-0.52). Furthermore, measures of OUE were significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with pulmonary function (FEV1%predicted) in CF (r = 0.38-0.46), but not CON (r = -0.20-0.14). OUEP was able to differentiate between different aerobic fitness tertiles in CON but not CF.

Conclusions: OUE parameters were reduced in CF, but were not a suitable surrogate for [Formula: see text]. Clinical teams should, where possible, continue to utilise maximal CPET parameters to measure aerobic fitness in children and adolescents with CF. Future research should assess the prognostic utility of OUEP as it does appear sensitive to disease status and severity.

Keywords: Adolescence; Aerobic fitness; Exercise testing; Paediatrics; Respiratory disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LVC is currently an employee of Springer Nature, but was solely associated with the University of Exeter at the time that the research was conducted.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Profiles of OUEP, OUEGET and OUERCP in a representative CPET from an individual child with CF (female, 12 years, homozygous ΔF508, FEV1 82.0%predicted, V˙O2peak 36.5 mL kg−1.min−1, 73.26 mL kg−0.86.min−1). Vertical line at 180 s indicates end of warm-up, and beginning of ramp phase. Vertical lines also indicate point of GET and RCP. Horizontal lines between 200–290 s = OUEP (31.9 mL L−1), 240–300 s = OUEGET (31.0 mL L−1), 500–560 s = OUERCP (19.7 mL L−1)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Differences in OUE (V˙O2/V˙E) between two representative children, CF (open square) and CON (open circle), throughout a ramp incremental CPET. Vertical line at 180 s indicates the end of the warm-up and beginning of ramp phase of the test. Vertical lines at 610 and 640 s indicate exhaustion for CF and CON participants, respectively. Solid horizontal lines at 31.9 mL L−1 (CF) and 43.0 mL L−1 (CON) indicate OUEP (highest 90 s average) for each group, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individual differences between age- and sex-matched CON and CF pairs for CPET-derived variables. All plots are calculated as CON minus CF, i.e. bars underneath y = 0 on x-axis indicate participant with CF has a greater value than CON counterpart. a Differences in allometrically scaled V˙O2peak between pairs. b Differences in OUEP between pairs, independent of differences in V˙O2peak. c Differences in V˙O2peak (mL kg−0.86.min−1) between pairs, plotted alongside within-pair differences in OUEP (mL L−1). Black bars represent V˙O2peak and grey bars indicate OUEP
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of V˙O2peak (a) and OUE parameters (b OUEP; c OUEGET; d OUERCP) between CF (black) and CON (white), split by V˙O2peak tertile. *Significant (p < 0.05) difference from highest tertile (within group). §Significant (p < 0.05) difference from middle tertile (within group). Significant (p < 0.05) difference between groups (within tertile)

References

    1. Abdi H. The Bonferonni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In: Salkind N, editor. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007. pp. 103–107.
    1. Arena R, Myers J, Hsu L, Peberdy MA, Pinkstaff S, Bensimhon D, Chase P, Vicenzi M, Guazzi M. The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope is prognostically superior to the oxygen uptake efficiency slope. J Cardiac Fail. 2007;13(6):462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baba R, Nagashima M, Goto M, Nagano Y, Yokota M, Tauchi N, Nishibata K. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: a new index of cardiorespiratory functional reserve derived from the relation between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation during incremental exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(6):1567–1572. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00412-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barker AR, Williams CA, Jones AM, Armstrong N. Establishing maximal oxygen uptake in young people during a ramp cycle test to exhaustion. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):498–503. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.063180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barron A, Francis DP, Mayet J, Ewert R, Obst A, Mason M, Elkin S, Hughes AD, Wensel R. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope and breathing reserve, not anaerobic threshold, discriminate between patients with cardiovascular disease over chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(4):252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.11.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed