Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 13;16(1):63.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0330-0.

Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations

Rebecca L Morgan  1 , Ivan Florez  1   2 , Maicon Falavigna  3   4 , Sergio Kowalski  1   5 , Elie A Akl  1   6 , Kristina A Thayer  7 , Andrew Rooney  8 , Holger J Schünemann  9   10   11
Affiliations

Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations

Rebecca L Morgan et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Practice guidelines require a substantial investment of resources and time, often taking between 1 and 3 years from conceptualisation to publication. However, urgent situations require the development of recommendations in a shorter timeframe. In this third and final article in the series exploring challenges and solutions in developing rapid guidelines (RGs), we propose guiding principles for the development of RGs.

Methods: We utilised the Guideline International Network-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) as a starting point for elements to consider during RG development. We built on those elements using the findings from a systematic review of guideline manuals, a survey of international organisations conducting RGs, and interviews of guideline developers within WHO. We reviewed initial findings and developed an intermediate list of elements, as well as narrative guidance. We then invited experts to validate the intermediate list, reviewing for placement, brevity and redundancy. We used this iterative process and group consensus to determine the final elements for RG development guidance.

Results: Our work identified 21 principles within the topics of the Guideline International Network-McMaster GDC to guide the planning and development of RGs. Principles fell within 15 of the 18 checklist topics, highlighting strategies to streamline and expedite the guideline development process.

Conclusions: We defined principles to guide the development of RGs, while maintaining a standardised, rigorous and transparent process. These principles will serve as guidance for guideline developers responding to urgent situations such as public health urgencies. Integration of these principles within currently disseminated guideline development standards will facilitate the use of those tools in situations necessitating RG recommendations.

Keywords: Clinical guidelines; GIN-McMaster Guideline Checklist; Guideline development; Rapid guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Steinberg E, Greenfield S, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Graham R. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developers' Handbook. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2008.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . The Guidelines Manual. London: NICE; 2012.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
    1. Thayer KA, Schünemann HJ. Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency. Environ Int. 2016;92-93:585–589. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.027. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources