Critical Analysis of Markov Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 30005759
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.010
Critical Analysis of Markov Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: The economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening is challenging because of the need to model the underlying unobservable natural history of the disease.
Objectives: To describe the available Markov models and to critically analyze their main structural assumptions.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in eight relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Econlit, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Health Economic Evaluations Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Cost-Effective Analysis Registry, and European Network of Health Economics Evaluation Databases), identifying 34 models that met the inclusion criteria. A comparative analysis of model structure and parameterization was conducted using two checklists and guidelines for cost-effectiveness screening models.
Results: Two modeling techniques were identified. One strategy used a Markov model to reproduce the natural history of the disease and an overlaying model that reproduced the screening process, whereas the other used a single model to represent a screening program. Most of the studies included only adenoma-carcinoma sequences, a few included de novo cancer, and none included the serrated pathway. Parameterization of adenoma dwell time, sojourn time, and surveillance differed between studies, and there was a lack of validation and statistical calibration against local epidemiological data. Most of the studies analyzed failed to perform an adequate literature review and synthesis of diagnostic accuracy properties of the screening tests modeled.
Conclusions: Several strategies to model colorectal cancer screening have been developed, but many challenges remain to adequately represent the natural history of the disease and the screening process. Structural uncertainty analysis could be a useful strategy for understanding the impact of the assumptions of different models on cost-effectiveness results.
Keywords: Markov models; colorectal cancer; economic evaluation; screening; structural uncertainty.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545207
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35233774 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
Cited by
-
Modeling the Natural History and Screening Effects of Colorectal Cancer Using Both Adenoma and Serrated Neoplasia Pathways: The Development, Calibration, and Validation of a Discrete Event Simulation Model.MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 19;8(1):23814683221145701. doi: 10.1177/23814683221145701. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2023. PMID: 36698854 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Decision Analytical Model for Posttreatment Surveillance for Patients With Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227240. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7240. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35416988 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used in Models of the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jan;42(1):19-40. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01312-4. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024. PMID: 37737454
-
Evaluating the Cost-Utility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Methods and Quality of Studies Using Decision Models or Empirical Data.Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Sep;42(9):929-953. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01388-6. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024. PMID: 38904911 Free PMC article.
-
The role of health economic evidence in clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer: a comparative analysis across countries.J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Apr;14(4):e240226. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0226. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Comp Eff Res. 2025. PMID: 39969114 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous