Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;33(3):724-730.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6333-7. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era

Christopher W Mangieri  1   2 , Bryan P Hendren  3 , Matthew A Strode  3   4 , Bradley C Bandera  3 , Byron J Faler  3
Affiliations

Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era

Christopher W Mangieri et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed laparoscopic procedure. It is superior in nearly every regard compared to open cholecystectomies. The one significant aspect where the laparoscopic approach is inferior regards the association with bile duct injuries (BDI). The BDI rate with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is approximately 0.5%; nearly triple the rate compared to the open approach. We propose that 0.5% BDI rate with the laparoscopic approach is no longer accurate.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry was retrospectively reviewed. All laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between 2012 and 2016 were extracted. A total of 217,774 cases meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. The primary data points were the overall BDI incidence rate and time of diagnosis. BDI were identified by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Secondary data points were variables associated with BDI.

Results: The BDI rate was 0.19%. 77% of cases were diagnosed after the index surgical admission. Intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) use was associated with a higher BDI rate and higher identification rate of a BDI intraoperatively (P value < 0.0001). Resident teaching cases were protective with a RR score of 0.56 (P value < 0.0001). The presence of cholecystitis increased the risk of a BDI with a RR score of 1.20 (P value < 0.0001). There was a low conversion rate of 0.04% however converted cases had a nearly hundredfold increase in BDI at 15% (P value < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in North America is no longer associated with higher BDI rates compared to open. IOC use still is not protective against BDI, and cholecystitis continues to be a risk factor for BDI. When a cholecystectomy requires conversion from a laparoscopic to an open approach the BDI increases a hundredfold; which may raise the concern if this approach is still a safe bailout method for a difficult laparoscopic dissection.

Keywords: BDI; Bile duct injury; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Procedural safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1995 Jul;170(1):55-9 - PubMed
    1. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(3):417-20 - PubMed
    1. HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(3):152-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1069-73 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2239-43 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources