Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;6(8):640-649.
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

Regional Adipose Distribution and its Relationship to Exercise Intolerance in Older Obese Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Affiliations

Regional Adipose Distribution and its Relationship to Exercise Intolerance in Older Obese Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Mark J Haykowsky et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to test the hypothesis that older obese patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have significantly greater abdominal, cardiac, and intermuscular fat than healthy, age-matched controls, out of proportion to total body fat, and that these abnormalities are associated with objective measurements of physical function.

Background: Recent studies indicate that excess total body adipose tissue contributes to exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF. However, the impact of the pattern of regional (abdominal, cardiac, intermuscular) adipose deposition on exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF is unknown.

Methods: We measured total body adiposity (using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and regional adiposity (using cardiac magnetic resonance), peak oxygen uptake (Vo2), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), short physical performance battery (SPPB), and leg press power in 100 older obese patients with HFpEF and 61 healthy controls (HCs) and adjusted for age, sex, race, and body surface area.

Results: Peak Vo2 (15.7 ± 0.4 ml/kg/min vs. 23.0 ± 0.6 ml/kg/min, respectively; p < 0.001), 6MWD (427 ± 7 m vs. 538 ± 10 m, respectively; p < 0.001), SPPB (10.3 ± 0.2 vs. 10.9 ± 0.2, respectively; p < 0.05), and leg power (117 ± 5 W vs. 152 ± 9 W, respectively; p = 0.004) were significantly lower in patients with HFpEF than HCs. Total fat mass, total percent fat, abdominal subcutaneous fat, intra-abdominal fat, and thigh intermuscular fat were significantly higher, whereas epicardial fat was significantly lower in patients with HFpEF than in HC. After we adjusted for total body fat, intra-abdominal fat remained significantly higher, while epicardial fat remained significantly lower in patients with HFpEF. Abdominal subcutaneous fat, thigh subcutaneous fat, and thigh intermuscular fat:skeletal muscle ratio were inversely associated, whereas epicardial fat was directly associated with peak Vo2, 6MWD, SPPB, and leg power. Using multiple stepwise regression, we found intra-abdominal fat was the strongest independent predictor of peak Vo2 and 6MWD.

Conclusions: In metabolic obese HFpEF, the pattern of regional adipose deposition may have important adverse consequences beyond total body adiposity. Interventions targeting intra-abdominal and intermuscular fat could potentially improve exercise intolerance. (Exercise Intolerance in Elderly Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure [SECRET]; NCT00959660).

Keywords: adipose; aging; exercise; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; obesity; physical function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) versus Regional Fat Measures
Regression plots for baseline measures of Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) versus (A) Intra-Abdominal Fat, (B) Abdominal SCF, (C) Thigh IMF, (D) Thigh IMF as Percent of Thigh Compartment (TC), (E) Paracardial Fat, (F) Epicardial Fat. Similar results were found for non-indexed Peak VO2 (ml/min) as well. Regional fat measures obtained using MRI. Thigh compartment calculated as Intermuscular Fat+Skeletal Muscle+Bone. Spearman r and p values additionally included for reference.

Comment in

  • Weighty Matters in HFpEF and Aging.
    Forman DE, Goodpaster BH. Forman DE, et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;6(8):650-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.06.016. JACC Heart Fail. 2018. PMID: 30071951 No abstract available.

References

    1. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):251–259. - PubMed
    1. Kitzman DW, Little WC, Brubaker PH, et al. Pathophysiological characterization of isolated diastolic heart failure in comparison to systolic heart failure. JAMA. 2002;288(17):2144–2150. - PubMed
    1. Haykowsky MJ, Brubaker PH, Morgan TM, Kritchevsky S, Eggebeen J, Kitzman DW. Impaired aerobic capacity and physical functional performance in older heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: role of lean body mass. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(8):968–975. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haykowsky M, Kouba EJ, Brubaker PH, Nicklas BJ, Eggebeen J, Kitzman DW. Skeletal muscle composition and its relation to exercise intolerance in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1211–1216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhella PS, Prasad A, Heinicke K, et al. Abnormal haemodynamic response to exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13(12):1296–1304. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data