Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;27(6):537-542.
doi: 10.1017/S204579601800032X. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis

Affiliations

The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis

M Solmi et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

ὠφελέειν, ἢ μὴ βλάπτειν (Primum non nocere) - Hιppocrates' principle should still guide daily medical prescribing. Therefore, assessing evidence of psychopharmacologic agents' safety and harms is essential. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies may provide complementary information about harms of psychopharmacologic medications from both experimental and real-world settings. It is considered that RCTs provide a better control of confounding variables, while observational studies provide evidence from larger samples, longer follow-ups, in more representative samples, which may be more reflective of real-life clinical scenarios. However, this may not always hold true. Moreover, in observational studies, safety data are poorly or inconsistently reported, precluding reliable quantitative synthesis in meta-analyses. Beyond individual studies, meta-analyses, which represent the highest level of 'evidence', can be misleading, redundant and of low methodological quality. Overlapping meta-analyses sometimes even reach different conclusions on the same topic. Meta-analyses should be assessed systematically. Descriptive reviews of reviews can be poorly informative. Conversely, 'umbrella reviews' can use a quantitative approach to grade evidence. In this editorial, we present the main factors involved in the assessment of psychopharmacologic agents' harms from individual studies, meta-analyses and umbrella reviews. Study design features, sample size, number of the events of interest, summary effect sizes, p-values, heterogeneity, 95% prediction intervals, confounding factor adjustment and tests of bias (e.g., small-study effects and excess significance) can be combined with other assessment tools, such as AMSTAR and GRADE to create a framework for assessing the credibility of evidence.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; psychotropic medications; safety; umbrella review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edn Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Belbasis L, Bellou V and Evangelou E (2016) Environmental risk factors and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an Umbrella review and critical assessment of current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Neuroepidemiology 46, 96–105. - PubMed
    1. Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E and Ioannidis JP (2016) Environmental risk factors and Parkinson's disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Parkinsonism Related Disorders 23, 1–9. - PubMed
    1. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson LZ, Ogawa Y, Leucht S, Ruhe HG, Turner EH, Higgins JPT, Egger M, Takeshima N, Hayasaka Y, Imai H, Shinohara K, Tajika A, Ioannidis JPA and Geddes JR (2018) Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 391, 1357–1366. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (Ed. Routledge). ISBN 1-134-74270-3.

Substances