Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;43(4):671-693.
doi: 10.1177/0162243917736138. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice

Affiliations

Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice

Pru Hobson-West et al. Sci Technol Human Values. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

The use of nonhuman animals as models in research and drug testing is a key route through which contemporary scientific knowledge is certified. Given ethical concerns, regulation of animal research promotes the use of less "sentient" animals. This paper draws on a documentary analysis of legal documents and qualitative interviews with Named Veterinary Surgeons and others at a commercial laboratory in the UK. Its key claim is that the concept of animal sentience is entangled with a particular imaginary of how the general public or wider society views animals. We call this imaginary societal sentience. Against a backdrop of increasing ethnographic work on care encounters in the laboratory, this concept helps to stress the wider context within which such encounters take place. We conclude that societal sentience has potential purchase beyond the animal research field, in helping to highlight the affective dimension of public imaginaries and their ethical consequences. Researching and critiquing societal sentience, we argue, may ultimately have more impact on the fate of humans and nonhumans in the laboratory than focusing wholly on ethics as situated practice.

Keywords: animal research; ethics; imaginaries; public; sentience; veterinarians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acampora R. 2006. Corporal Compassion. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    1. APC (Animal Procedures Committee). 1993. Annual Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1992. London, UK: HMSO.
    1. Asdal K. 2012. “Contexts in Action—And the Future of the Past in STS.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (4): 379–403.
    1. ASPA (Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act). 1986 (c.14). London, UK: HMSO; Accessed July 28, 2017 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil...
    1. Barnett C., Land D. 2007. “Geographies of Generosity: Beyond the Moral Turn.” Geoforum 38 (6): 1065–75.

LinkOut - more resources