Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 19;14(2):464-484.
doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1483. eCollection 2018 Jun.

Testing Intergroup Threat Theory: Realistic and Symbolic Threats, Religiosity and Gender as Predictors of Prejudice

Ana Makashvili  1 , Irina Vardanashvili  1 , Nino Javakhishvili  1
Affiliations

Testing Intergroup Threat Theory: Realistic and Symbolic Threats, Religiosity and Gender as Predictors of Prejudice

Ana Makashvili et al. Eur J Psychol. .

Abstract

The complex phenomenon of prejudice has been the focus of interest among social psychologists since the mid-20th century. The Intergroup Threat Theory (ITT) is one of the most efficient theoretical frameworks to identify the triggers of prejudice. In this study, using experimental design, we examined the effects of symbolic and realistic threats on prejudice that was measured by means of a modified social distance scale. The study participants were 611 undergraduate students from the country of Georgia. In addition to providing further support for ITT, the study showed that the level of religiosity moderated the effects between both types of threats and prejudice, although it had different indications for realistic and symbolic threats, while gender interacted only with symbolic threat. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords: intergroup threat theory; prejudice; realistic and symbolic threats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Aberson C. L., Gaffney A. M. (2008). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830. doi:.10.1002/ejsp.582 - DOI
    1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY, USA: Harper and Row.
    1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Addison-Wesley.
    1. Allport G. W., Kramer B. M. (1946). Some roots of prejudice. The Journal of Psychology, 22, 9–39. 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917293 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altemeyer B. (1998). The other “Authoritarian Personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources