Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 22:12:104-109.
doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010104. eCollection 2018.

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss

Affiliations

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss

Edsel Ing et al. Open Ophthalmol J. .

Abstract

Background: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact "air puff" Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with headache or vision loss.

Objective: To determine the agreement between DCT and NCT.

Methods: The IOP of adult patients 50 years of age or older presenting with headache or vision loss for possible temporal artery biopsy were prospectively recorded. NCT and DCT measurements were obtained within thirty minutes. The right eye IOP measurements were compared with paired t-test, and Bland- Altman plot analysis. The left eye IOP measurements were subsequently analyzed for confirmation of results.

Results: There were 106 subjects with complete right eye data, and 104 subjects with complete left eye data. The average age was 72 years, and 70% were female. The NCT IOP was on average 3.9 mm Hg lower in the right eye, and 3.5 mm Hg lower in the left eye compared with DCT. (p<.001) In the right eye the Bland-Altman analysis showed the 95% agreement interval between the two tonometers was -2.5 to 10.4 mmHg and in the left eye -3.0 to 9.9 mmHg.

Conclusion: The IOP from NCT and DCT should not be used interchangeably because their level of disagreement includes clinically important discrepancies of up to 10 mm Hg.

Keywords: Agreement; Bland-Altman plot; Dynamic contour tonometry; Giant cell arteritis; Headache; Intraocular pressure; Non-contact tonometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)

Similar articles

References

    1. Eisenberg D. Reconsidering the gold standard of tonometry. Glaucoma Today. Early Spring; 2011.
    1. Eisenberg D. Accurate tonmetry: Is help on the way? Not today. Glaucoma Today. 2015.
    1. Bochmann F., Kaufmann C., Thiel M.A. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: Challenging the gold standard. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 2010;5(6):743. doi: 10.1586/eop.10.68. - DOI
    1. Stamper R.L. A history of intraocular pressure and its measurement. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2011;88(1):E16–E28. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318205a4e7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M., Tosoni C., Brusini P. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2007;85(3):272–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources