Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;265(10):2201-2210.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8975-8. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

The intraventricular-spot sign: prevalence, significance, and relation to hematoma expansion and outcomes

Omar Hussein  1 , Khalid Sawalha  2 , Mohammad Hamed  2 , Ahmed Abd ElAzim  2 , Lai Wei  3 , Michel T Torbey  2 , Archana Hinduja  2
Affiliations

The intraventricular-spot sign: prevalence, significance, and relation to hematoma expansion and outcomes

Omar Hussein et al. J Neurol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The presence of the spot sign on computed tomography angiogram (CTA) is considered a sign of active bleeding, and studies have shown it can predict hematoma expansion in intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH). The spot sign in intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) has not been explored yet. The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of the intraventricular-spot sign, and its prediction of hematoma expansion and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrieved data of hemorrhagic stroke patients seen at our medical center from January 2013 to January 2018. A total of 321 subjects were filtered for the prevalence analysis (PA). We further excluded 114 subjects without a follow-up CT-head for the hematoma expansion analysis (HEA). Patients were grouped based on the location of hemorrhage into three groups: isolated IPH with the spot sign always in IPH (i-IPH), isolated IVH with the spot sign always in IVH (i-IVH), and combined IPH and IVH which would be further sub-grouped according to the location of the spot sign: in IPH only (IPH+/IVH) and in IVH only (IPH/IVH+). The prevalence, demographics, and incidence of hematoma expansion were compared between the groups using Pearson's chi-square test and Student's t test.

Results: The prevalence of the spot sign was 8, 20, 17, 5% in (i-IPH), (i-IVH), (IPH+/IVH), and (IPH/IVH+) groups, respectively. The rate of hematoma expansion were (42 vs. 13%), (33 vs. 31%), (80 vs. 22%), and (25 vs. 22%) in spot sign positive vs. negative subjects in each group, respectively (p values = 0.023, = 1, <0.001, and = 1).

Conclusion: We studied the prediction of spot sign on hematoma expansion and clinical outcomes in the different subtypes of ICH. Our study showed that spot sign is a good predictor in IPH but not IVH. Despite the rarity of IVH; the prevalence of spot sign was higher in IVH than IPH. This might be due to anatomical and physiological variations.

Keywords: Hematoma expansion; Intraventricular-spot sign; Isolated intraventricular hemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003 Sep;43(1):164-78 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Sep;18(9):1215-8 - PubMed
    1. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 Oct 14;56(12):1695-716 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Sci. 2002 Jan 15;193(2):137-46 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):581-586 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources