The role of the (6-4) photoproduct in ultraviolet light-induced transition mutations in E. coli

Abstract

Available evidence rules out the possibility that cyclobutane dimers are the major premutagenic lesions responsible for point mutations at sites of adjacent pyrimidine residues in the experiment systems examined to date in sufficient detail, that is, UV-induced mutations in chromosome loci in E. coli and UV-induced mutations in the cI gene of phage lambda. However, it is likely that the major cytotoxic effects of UV irradiation can be attributed to the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, as these lesions occur at 10 times the frequency of other UV-induced photoproducts in the dose range of 0.1-100 J/m2. The evidence also suggests that cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are the major lesions responsible for induction of the SOS response and that as such they play an important, though indirect role, in the formation of mutations in irradiated DNA. Cyclobutane dimers may also be the major lesions responsible for other types of UV-light-induced mutations such as deletions. None of the available evidence rules out (6-4) photoproducts as a major premutagenic lesion induced by UV irradiation using these experimental systems. On the contrary, the mutation spectrum induced both in the lacI gene and the cI gene of phage lambda is that predicted for mutations induced by (6-4) photoproducts. The observation that neither the premutagenic lesions nor the (6-4) photoproduct is subject to enzymatic photoreactivation also implies that the (6-4) photoproducts are premutagenic. As reviewed above, neither the photosensitization experiments nor the action spectrum of the (6-4) photoproducts rules out such a role. Might a lesion other than the (6-4) photoproduct be the major premutagenic lesion responsible for point mutations in these experimental systems? It cannot be ruled out that another as yet undefined minor photoproduct that occurs with the same sequence distribution specificity as that of the (6-4) photoproduct and that is also not subject to the reactivating treatments is more mutagenic than the (6-4) photoproduct itself. Candidates for such a lesion might include a photohydrate of the (6-4) photoproduct itself or as yet undefined photoproducts. However, we believe these alternative possibilities to be remote.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)