Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 19:2018:3604108.
doi: 10.1155/2018/3604108. eCollection 2018.

Sagittal Abdominal Diameter, Waist Circumference, and BMI as Predictors of Multiple Measures of Glucose Metabolism: An NHANES Investigation of US Adults

Affiliations

Sagittal Abdominal Diameter, Waist Circumference, and BMI as Predictors of Multiple Measures of Glucose Metabolism: An NHANES Investigation of US Adults

Shelby A Firouzi et al. J Diabetes Res. .

Abstract

The objective was to compare associations between sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), waist circumference, and BMI to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), along with fasting glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR, in a nationally representative sample of 3582 US adults. The study also analyzed the effect of multiple covariates on the anthropometric and glucose metabolism associations. A cross-sectional design was used. SAD was assessed using an abdominal caliper. All other data were collected following strict NHANES protocols. The OGTT was the primary variable used to index glucose metabolism. Fasting glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR were also evaluated. Results showed that mean ± SE values were as follows: SAD: 22.3 ± 0.1 cm, waist circumference: 98.0 ± 0.4 cm, BMI: 28.6 ± 0.2 kg/m2, OGTT: 113.9 ± 1.0 mg/dL, fasting glucose: 99.6 ± 0.3 mg/dL, HbA1c: 5.4 ± 0.01%, and HOMA-IR: 3.2 ± 0.1. Compared to waist circumference and BMI, SAD consistently emerged as the best predictor of glucose metabolism, before and after adjusting for the covariates, and with the sample stratified by gender, race, or age. SAD was not a better predictor of OGTT among normal-weight adults or non-Hispanic Black adults. Due to the ease of taking SAD measurements, we recommend that healthcare providers use this simple method to more precisely predict diabetes risk, especially among overweight and obese adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Atlanta, GA, USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Supplement 1):S8–s16. doi: 10.2337/dc15-s005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Center for Health Statistics (US) Health, United States, 2015: with Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Hyattsville, MD, USA: National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2016. - PubMed
    1. Aldasouqi S. A., Gossain V. V. Update on diabetes diagnosis: a historical review of the dilemma of the diagnostic utility of glycohemoglobin A1c and a proposal for a combined glucose-A1c diagnostic method. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2012;32(3):229–235. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selph S., Dana T., Blazina I., Bougatsos C., Patel H., Chou R. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;162(11):765–776. doi: 10.7326/M14-2221. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources