Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Dec;20(12):2876-2884.
doi: 10.1111/dom.13473. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin compared with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild renal insufficiency: The CompoSIT-R study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin compared with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild renal insufficiency: The CompoSIT-R study

Russell Scott et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin with the sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and mild renal insufficiency.

Materials and methods: Patients with HbA1c ≥7.0 to ≤9.5% (≥53 to ≤80 mmol/mol) and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 to <90 mL/min/1.73m2 on metformin (≥1500 mg/d) ± sulfonylurea were randomized to sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 307) or dapagliflozin 5 mg titrated to 10 mg (n = 306) once daily for 24 weeks. A longitudinal data analysis model was used to test the primary hypothesis that sitagliptin is non-inferior to dapagliflozin in reducing HbA1c at Week 24, with superiority to be tested if non-inferiority is met. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02532855.

Results: Baseline mean HbA1c (% [mmol/mol]) was 7.7 (60.9) and 7.8 (61.2), and mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2 ) was 79.4 and 76.9 for the sitagliptin and dapagliflozin groups, respectively. After 24 weeks, the between-group difference in least squares mean (95% CI) changes from baseline in HbA1c was -0.15% (-0.26, -0.04) (-1.67 mmol/mol [-2.86, -0.48]), P = 0.006, meeting the prespecified criteria for declaring both non-inferiority and superiority of sitagliptin versus dapagliflozin. The HbA1c goal of <7% (<53 mmol/mol) was met by 43% (sitagliptin) and 27% (dapagliflozin) of patients. No meaningful between-group difference was observed in a pre-specified analysis of 2-hour incremental postprandial glucose excursion. A review of adverse events (AEs) was notable for a lower incidence of drug-related AEs with sitagliptin compared with dapagliflozin.

Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes, mild renal insufficiency and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin ± sulfonylurea, sitagliptin treatment resulted in greater improvement in glycaemic control compared with dapagliflozin and was generally well tolerated.

Keywords: clinical trial; dapagliflozin; sitagliptin; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J. M., Z. Z., R. L. H. L., E. A. O., K. D. K., S. S. E. and A. R. are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company. R. S. has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; q.d., once daily; SU, sulfonylurea; R, randomization.1Subjects initiated dapagliflozin 5 mg q.d. at Randomization/Visit 3/Day 1 and were to uptitrated to dapagliflozin 10 mg q.d. at Visit 4/Week 4. 2The interval between Visit 1 and Visit 2 for eligible subjects was to be at least 2 weeks and no more than approximately 6 weeks. 3Subjects entering the study on metformin remained on a stable dose of metformin; subjects entering on metformin + an SU remained on stable doses of both agents
Figure 2
Figure 2
HbA1c measures through week 24: A, LS mean ± SE change from baseline HbA1c (%); black circles = sitagliptin, open circles = dapagliflozin; B, percentage of patients at goal of HbA1c <7% at week 24. For both A and B, results were calculated using the LDA model described in Methods

References

    1. Bailey RA, Wang Y, Zhu V, Rupnow MF. Chronic kidney disease in US adults with type 2 diabetes: an updated national estimate of prevalence based on kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) staging. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hahr AJ, Molitch ME. Management of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;1:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deacon CF. A review of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors. Hot topics from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(Suppl 1):34‐46. - PubMed
    1. Arnouts P, Bolignano D, Nistor I, et al. Glucose‐lowering drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review on pharmacokinetic properties. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:1284‐1300. - PubMed
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604‐612. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data