Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 17;6(7):e160.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9729.

Digital Food Records in Community-Based Interventions: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

Lauren A Fowler  1   2 , Leah R Yingling  1 , Alyssa T Brooks  3 , Gwenyth R Wallen  3 , Marlene Peters-Lawrence  4 , Michael McClurkin  1 , Kenneth L Wiley Jr  5 , Valerie M Mitchell  1 , Twanda D Johnson  3 , Kendrick E Curry  6 , Allan A Johnson  7 , Avis P Graham  7 , Lennox A Graham  7 , Tiffany M Powell-Wiley  1
Affiliations

Digital Food Records in Community-Based Interventions: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

Lauren A Fowler et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: A pressing need exists to understand and optimize the use of dietary assessment tools that can be used in community-based participatory research (CBPR) interventions. A digital food record, which uses a mobile device to capture the dietary intake through text and photography inputs, is a particularly promising mobile assessment method. However, little is understood about the acceptability and feasibility of digital food records in CBPR and how to best tailor dietary assessment tools to the needs of a community.

Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of digital food records among church-based populations in resource-limited wards of Washington, DC, USA, using a mixed-methods approach.

Methods: This community-based pilot study was conducted as part of the Washington, DC Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment. Participants (n=17) received a mobile device (iPod Touch) to photodocument their dietary intake for a 3-day digital food record using a mobile app, FitNinja (Vibrent Health). The acceptability of the digital food record was explored through the thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts from a moderated focus group (n=8). In addition, the feasibility was evaluated by the percentage of participants complying with instructions (ie, capturing both before and after meal photos for at least 2 meals/day for 3 days).

Results: Qualitative themes identified were related to (1) the feasibility and acceptability of the mobile device and app, including issues in recording the dietary information and difficulty with photodocumentation; (2) suggestions for additional support and training experiences; and (3) comparisons with other mobile apps. Overall, the participants accepted the digital food record by demonstrating satisfaction with the tool and intent to continue the use (eg, participants recorded an average of 5.2, SD 7, consecutive days). Furthermore, of the 17 participants, 15 photodocumented at least 1 meal during the study period and 3 fully complied with the digital food record instructions.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated digital food records as an acceptable tool in CBPR and identified contributors and barriers to the feasibility of digital food records for future research. Engaging community members in the implementation of novel assessment methods allows for the tailoring of technology to the needs of the community and optimizing community-based interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01927783; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01927783 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70WzaFWb6).

Keywords: community-based participatory research; diet; focus group, obesity; mHealth; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Secure data collection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Excerpts from the instruction manual for FitNinja.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Writing GM, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, Das SR, de FS, Després J, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Isasi CR, Jiménez MC, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Rosamond W, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB, American HASC, Stroke SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38–360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350.CIR.0000000000000350 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i–viii, 1. - PubMed
    1. Chou S, Grossman M, Saffer H. An economic analysis of adult obesity: results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Health Econ. 2004 May;23(3):565–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.003.S0167-6296(04)00020-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grafova IB, Freedman VA, Kumar R, Rogowski J. Neighborhoods and obesity in later life. Am J Public Health. 2008 Nov;98(11):2065–71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.127712.AJPH.2007.127712 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ammerman A, Corbie-Smith G, St GDMM, Washington C, Weathers B, Jackson-Christian B. Research expectations among African American church leaders in the PRAISE! project: a randomized trial guided by community-based participatory research. Am J Public Health. 2003 Oct;93(10):1720–7. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources