Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;14(7):20180300.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0300.

Plumage coloration and social context influence male investment in song

Affiliations

Plumage coloration and social context influence male investment in song

L J Henderson et al. Biol Lett. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Animals use multiple signals to attract mates, including elaborate song, brightly coloured ornaments and physical displays. Female birds often prefer both elaborate male song and intense carotenoid-based plumage coloration. This could lead less visually ornamented males to increase song production to maximize their attractiveness to females. We tested this possibility in the highly social and non-territorial house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), in which females discriminate among males based on both song and on the intensity of red carotenoid-based plumage coloration. We manipulated male plumage coloration through carotenoid supplementation during moult, so that males were either red or yellow. Males were then housed under three social environments: (i) all red birds, (ii) all yellow birds or (iii) a mixture of red/yellow birds. We recorded song after presentation of a female. Red males produced more song than yellow males. But when yellow males were housed with red conspecifics, they produced more song relative to yellow males housed with equally unattractive yellow males. This study provides novel evidence that a male's plumage coloration and the plumage colour of his social competitors influence investment in song.

Keywords: mate choice; sexual-selection; signalling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) The two plumage colours produced by carotenoid manipulation. (b) Influence of plumage colour and social group upon male song production. (c) Song complexity was unaffected by social group or plumage colour. **p < 0.001. Graphs show mean ± s.e. Shaded bars indicate birds housed under mixed conditions (RM and YM).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Influence of male plumage colour upon (a) number of circular flights performed by females and (b) percentage of time spent by female in the half of cage closest to male. *p < 0.05. Graphs show mean ± s.e., n = 8.

References

    1. Laidre ME, Johnstone RA. 2013. Animal signals. Curr. Biol. 23, R829–R833. (10.1016/J.CUB.2013.07.070) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Birkhead TR, Surai PF. 2003. Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science 300, 125–127. (10.1126/science.1082142) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2003. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Sewall KB, Dankoski EC, Sockman KW. 2010. Song environment affects singing effort and vasotocin immunoreactivity in the forebrain of male Lincoln's sparrows. Horm. Behav. 58, 544–553. (10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.04.002) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources