Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 15;28(2):020707.
doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.020707.

Risk analysis and assessment based on Sigma metrics and intended use

Affiliations

Risk analysis and assessment based on Sigma metrics and intended use

Yong Xia et al. Biochem Med (Zagreb). .

Abstract

Introduction: In order to ensure the quality in clinical laboratories and meet the low risk requirements of patients and clinicians, a risk analysis and assessment model based on Sigma metrics and intended use was constructed, based on which differential sigma performance (σ) expectations of 42 analytes were developed.

Materials and methods: Failure mode and effects analysis was applied to produce an analytic risk rating based on three factors, each test of which was graded as follows: 1) Sigma metrics; 2) the severity of harm; 3) intended use. By multiplying the score of Sigma metrics by the score of severity of harm by the score of intended use, each was assigned a typical risk priority number (RPN), with RPN ≤ 25 rated as low risk. Low risk was defined as acceptable standards; the sigma performance expectations were calculated.

Results: Among the 42 analytes, tests with σ ≥ 6, 5 ≤ σ < 6, 4 ≤ σ < 5, 3 ≤ σ < 4, σ < 3 were 21, 5, 5, 6, and 5, respectively; there were 7 high-risk tests, 8 of them medium risk tests. According to the risk assessment conclusion, 13 tests had sigma performance expectations ≥ 6; 15 test items had sigma performance expectations ≥ 5, while 3 test items had sigma performance expectations ≥ 4; 11 test items had sigma performance expectations ≥ 3.

Conclusions: Constructing the risk analysis and assessment model based on Sigma metrics and intended use will help clinical laboratories to identify the high-risk tests more objectively and comprehensively. Such model can also be used to establish the sigma performance expectations and meet the low risk requirements of patients and clinicians.

Keywords: Sigma metrics; Six Sigma; failure mode and effects analysis; risk analysis; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Normalized method decision chart demonstrating the Sigma metrics. ALT - alanine aminotransferase. AST - aspartate aminotransferase. ALP - alkaline phosphatase. GGT - gamma-glutamyltransferase. TP - total protein. ALB – albumin. BT – bilirubin, total. BD – bilirubin, direct. CREA – creatinine. UA - uric acid. Glc – glucose. CK - creatinine kinase. LD - lactate dehydrogenase. AMY – amylase. TG – triglycerides. CHOL - cholesterol. HDL – high density lipoprotein. LDL – low density lipoprotein. K – potassium. Na – sodium. Cl – chloride. Ca – calcium. Mg – magnesium. Phos – inorganic phosphate. Fe – iron. TRSF - transferrin. IgG – immunoglobulin G. IgM – immunoglobulin M. IgA – immunoglobulin A. PA - pre-albumin. Cys-C - cystatin C. BMG - ß2-microglobulin. C3 – complement C3. C4 – complement C4. CRP - C-reactive protein. cTn-I – cardiac troponin I. cTn-T – cardiac troponin T. pH – acidity. pCO2 - partial pressure of carbon dioxide. pO2 - partial pressure of oxygen. HbA1c – glycated haemoglobin.

References

    1. Agarwal R. Measurement of Errors in Clinical Laboratories. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013;28:227–34. 10.1007/s12291-013-0314-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Kane M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:28–31. 10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Laboratory quality control based on risk management - Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP23-A. Wayne: CLSI, 2011.
    1. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO, 2012.
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Statistical Quality Control for Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Principles and Definitions - Approved Guideline. CLSI document C24. Wayne: CLSI, 2016.