Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 13:10:1758835918786658.
doi: 10.1177/1758835918786658. eCollection 2018.

Dancing with the DNA damage response: next-generation anti-cancer therapeutic strategies

Affiliations
Review

Dancing with the DNA damage response: next-generation anti-cancer therapeutic strategies

Anna Minchom et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Maintenance of genomic stability is a critical determinant of cell survival and relies on the coordinated action of the DNA damage response (DDR), which orchestrates a network of cellular processes, including DNA replication, DNA repair and cell-cycle progression. In cancer, the critical balance between the loss of genomic stability in malignant cells and the DDR provides exciting therapeutic opportunities. Drugs targeting DDR pathways taking advantage of clinical synthetic lethality have already shown therapeutic benefit - for example, the PARP inhibitor olaparib has shown benefit in BRCA-mutant ovarian and breast cancer. Olaparib has also shown benefit in metastatic prostate cancer in DDR-defective patients, expanding the potential biomarker of response beyond BRCA. Other agents and combinations aiming to block the DDR while pushing damaged DNA through the cell cycle, including PARP, ATR, ATM, CHK and DNA-PK inhibitors, are in development. Emerging work is also uncovering how the DDR interacts intimately with the host immune response, including by activating the innate immune response, further suggesting that clinical applications together with immunotherapy may be beneficial. Here, we review recent considerations related to the DDR from a clinical standpoint, providing a framework to address future directions and clinical opportunities.

Keywords: DNA damage response; PARP inhibitors; immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
DDR pathways. (a) DNA strand breaks activating DNA repair pathways; (b) stalled replication fork leading to ATR activation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
DDR agents and interaction with the immune environment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The DDR treatment paradigm.

References

    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–674. - PubMed
    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461: 1071–1078. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature 2012; 481: 287–294. - PubMed
    1. Brown JS, O’Carrigan B, Jackson SP, et al. Targeting DNA repair in cancer: beyond PARP inhibitors. Cancer Discov 2017; 7: 20–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeman MK, Cimprich KA. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2014; 16: 2–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources