Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Oct:77:72-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 12-Months results of a randomized controlled pilot trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 12-Months results of a randomized controlled pilot trial

Karim Elhennawy et al. J Dent. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: For deep carious lesions, selective or stepwise carious tissue removal (SE, SW) seem advantageous compared with non-selective removal. For primary molars, there is insufficient evidence comparing SE against SW. This randomized pilot trial compared SE and SW over 12 months.

Methods: A two-arm superiority trial was conducted comparing SE and SW in primary molars with deep lesions but without pulpal symptoms. We recruited 74 children (one molar/child) aged 3-9 years. In both groups, peripheral carious tissue removal was performed at T1 to hard dentin. In proximity to the pulp, leathery dentin was left followed by an adhesive compomer restoration. Blinded re-examination was performed after six months (T2). Molars allocated to SW were re-entered, removal to firm dentin carried out pulpo-proximally, and again restored. After another 6 months, all molars were re-examined (T3). Our primary outcome was success, defined as no restorative/endodontic complications (including pulp exposure) leading to reinterventions. Secondary outcomes included total treatment and opportunity costs. Patients', dentists' and parents' subjective assessments were recorded. This trial was registered (ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02232828).

Results: After 12 months a total of 72 children (36 SE, 36 SW) were analyzed. Three failures occurred (2 exposures in SW, 1 pulpal complication leading to extraction in SE) (p > 0.05). The subjective evaluation by patients, parents or dentists did not differ significantly. Combined treatment and opportunity costs were significantly higher in SW (mean;SD: 186;61 Euro) than SE (100;59) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The significantly increased costs for performing SW instead of SE in deep carious lesions in primary molars may not be justified.

Clinical significance: For primary molars with deep lesions, but vital pulps, SE was less costly at similar efficacy compared with SW. Dentists' decision-making should consider this alongside further clinical aspects.

Keywords: Caries; Costs; Dentin; One-step removal; Partial removal; Two-step removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources