Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0201055.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201055. eCollection 2018.

Prehypertension increases the risk of atherosclerosis in drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Prehypertension increases the risk of atherosclerosis in drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ippei Kanazawa et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: Hypertension is a risk factor of atherosclerotic diseases. However, the importance of prehypertension in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine association between prehypertension, hypertension and atherosclerosis in T2DM.

Methods: We recruited 179 Japanese patients with T2DM, who never took any medication for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or atherosclerosis. Intima-media thickness (IMT) of common carotid artery was evaluated by high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography.

Results: Multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and estimated glomerular filtration rate showed that systolic blood pressure (SBP), but not diastolic BP, was significantly and positively associated with maximum IMT (IMT-max), mean IMT, and plaque score (β = 0.28, p<0.001; β = 0.26, p = 0.047; and β = 0.25, p = 0.006, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the cut-off value of SBP to detect atherosclerosis (IMT-max 1.8mm, the mean of IMT-max of this subjects) was 133.5 (p = 0.008), while DBP was not useful to detect it (p = 0.433). Then, participants were categorized as normotension (SBP <119 mmHg), prehypertension (SBP 120-139 mmHg), and hypertension (>140 mmHg). Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for the variables described above plus gender and smoking showed that prehypertension and hypertension were significantly associated with the increased risk of atherosclerosis [prehypertension; odds ratio (OR) 3.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-10.76, p = 0.033, and hypertension; OR 7.29, 95%CI 1.99-26.78, p = 0.003].

Conclusion: These findings suggest that prehypertension categorized by SBP is an important risk factor of atherosclerosis independently of conventional risk factors in patients with T2DM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. ROC curves to evaluate the cut-off values of SBP and DBP to predict IMT-max above 1.8 mm.
(A) SBP, (B) DBP.

References

    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1979; 241: 2035–2038. - PubMed
    1. Fujishima M, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Ohmura T, Iwamoto H, Nakayama K, et al. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease in a prospective population survey in Japan: The Hisayama Study. Diabetes. 1979; 45 Suppl 3: S14–16. - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 1998; 352: 837–853. - PubMed
    1. ACCORD Study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Buse JB, et al. Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 818–828. 10.1056/NEJMoa1006524 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2560–2572. 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987 - DOI - PubMed