Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul 19;8(7):e022307.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022307.

Care home resident and staff perceptions of the acceptability of nutrition intervention trial procedures: a qualitative study embedded within a cluster randomised feasibility trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Care home resident and staff perceptions of the acceptability of nutrition intervention trial procedures: a qualitative study embedded within a cluster randomised feasibility trial

Ruth Elizabeth Stow et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To examine care home resident and staff perceptions of the acceptability of participating in a feasibility trial evaluating nutritional interventions in the treatment of malnutrition.

Design: Exploratory qualitative methodology was used to gather descriptions of resident and staff perceptions of trial procedures, using semi-structured interviews with residents and focus groups with staff. The interviews were used to explore individual perceptions of the acceptability of the assigned intervention and the outcomes measured. Focus groups were used to explore staff experiences of trial participation and perspectives of nutritional support interventions.

Setting: The study was embedded within a cluster randomised feasibility trial, which randomised six care homes to provide standard care (SC), food-based (FB) intervention or oral nutritional supplement (ONS) intervention to residents with, or at risk of, malnutrition.

Participants: Residents in the trial with capacity to consent (n=7) formed the sampling frame for inclusion. Four agreed to be approached by the researcher and to take part in the individual interviews. All were women, representing two arms of the trial (ONS and SC). Twelve staff participated in six focus groups, one at each care home. All participants were women, representing all three arms of the trial.

Results: Major themes that emerged from both interviews and focus groups included the perceived acceptability of trial involvement, the value of residents completing participant-reported outcome measures and the challenges associated with outcomes measurement in this setting. Themes that emerged from the focus groups alone, included the importance of individualising an intervention, and the perceived value of FB and ONS interventions and dietetic input.

Conclusions: Residents and staff perceived involvement in a trial evaluating nutritional interventions to be acceptable, although the challenges associated with research in this setting were acknowledged. Resident preferences were highlighted by staff as an important consideration when implementing a nutrition support plan.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN38047922.

Keywords: care homes; focus groups; geriatric medicine; malnutrition; older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. LaingBuisson. Care of older people: UK market report, 27th edition. 2015. http://www.laingbuisson.co.uk/Portals/1/MarketReports/Documents/Care_Old... (accessed 04 Feb 2018).
    1. Nimmo AW, Peterkin G, Coid DR. Mortality in general practice: problems concerning deaths in institutions. Public Health 2006;120:671–5. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinclair AJ, Gadsby R, Penfold S, et al. . Prevalence of diabetes in care home residents. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1066–8. 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bayer A, Tadd W. Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study. BMJ 2000;321:992–3. 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.992 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elia M. The cost of malnutrition in England and potential cost savings from nutritional interventions. Malnutrition Action Group of BAPEN and the National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre. 2015. http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/economic-report-full.pdf (accessed 04 Feb 2018).

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources