Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;12(2):654-672.
doi: 10.1111/tops.12372. Epub 2018 Jul 22.

Culture: The Driving Force of Human Cognition

Affiliations
Free article

Culture: The Driving Force of Human Cognition

Ivan Colagè et al. Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

It is often, though sometimes only implicitly, assumed that biological/genetic evolution sets neural substrates, that neural substrates fix cognitive abilities, and that cognitive abilities determine the spectrum of cultural practices exhibited by a biological species. We label this view as the "bottom-up-only" view. In this paper we will show that such a "chain of dependence" is much looser than usually assumed, especially as far as recent periods (the last 800,000 years vs. the last 7 million years or more) are considered. We will provide evidence and arguments supporting the idea that cultural innovation may have direct and ascertainable effects both on the cognitive capabilities of populations of hominins (via what we call "cultural exaptation") and on the neural substrates of the individuals in those populations (via what we call "cultural neural reuse"). Together, cultural exaptation and cultural neural reuse may give raise to a plausible general mechanism for cognitive evolution in which culture is the driving force, thus offering a "top-down-also" view of human evolution.

Keywords: Behavioral modernity; Cultural evolution; Cultural innovations; Exaptation; Gene-culture co-evolution; Neural reuse; Neuroplasticity; Paleolithic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson, M. L. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    1. Arbib, M. A. (2013). How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Arbib, M. A. (2016). Towards a computational comparative neuroprimatology: Framing the language-ready brain. Physics of Life Reviews, 16, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.09.003.
    1. Bar-Yosef, O. (1998). On the nature of transitions: The middle to upper palaeolithic and the neolithic revolution. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 8, 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001815.
    1. Bickerton, D. (2014). More than nature needs: Language, mind and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources