Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun;10(3):246-253.
doi: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76884. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

Brachytherapy boost after chemoradiation in anal cancer: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Brachytherapy boost after chemoradiation in anal cancer: a systematic review

Rezarta Frakulli et al. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Radio-chemotherapy (RCT) is the primary treatment of anal cancer (AC). However, the role and the optimal total dose of a radiation boost is still unclear. No randomized controlled trials nor systematic reviews have been performed to analyze the efficacy of brachytherapy (BRT) as boost in AC. Therefore, we performed this systematic review based on PRISMA methodology to establish the role of BRT boost in AC. A systematic search of the bibliographic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library from the earliest possible date through January 31, 2018 was performed. At least one of the following outcomes: local control (LC), loco-regional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or colostomy-free survival (CFS) had to be present for inclusion in this systematic review in patients receiving a BRT boost. Data about toxicity and sphincter function were also included. Ten articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the studies had retrospective study design. All studies were classified to provide a level of evidence graded as 3 according to SIGN classification. Median 5-year LC/LRC, CFS, DFS, and OS were: 78.6% (range, 70.7-92.0%), 76.1% (range, 61.4-86.4%), 75.8% (range, 65.9-85.7%), and 69.4% (63.4-82.0%), respectively. The reported toxicities were acceptable. RCT is the treatment cornerstone in AC. High-level evidences from studies on BRT boost in AC are lacking. Further studies should investigate: efficacy of BRT boost in comparison to no boost and to external beam boost, patients who can benefit from this treatment intensification, and optimal radiation dose.

Keywords: anal cancer; brachytherapy boost; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the systematic search and review process

References

    1. Jemal A, Simard EP, Dorell C, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2009, featuring the burden and trends in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers and HPV vaccination coverage levels. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:175–201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boman BM, Moertel CG, O’Connell MJ, et al. Carcinoma of the anal canal. A clinical and pathologic study of 188 cases. Cancer. 1984;54:114–125. - PubMed
    1. Greenall MJ, Quan SH, Urmacher C, et al. Treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;161:509–517. - PubMed
    1. Dougherty BG, Evans HL. Carcinoma of the anal canal: A study of 79 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83:159–164. - PubMed
    1. Nigro ND, Vaitkevicius VK, Considine B., Jr Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal: A preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974;17:354–356. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources