Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 17:10:1758835918786451.
doi: 10.1177/1758835918786451. eCollection 2018.

CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: current practice and future directions

Affiliations
Review

CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: current practice and future directions

Sonia Pernas et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

The cyclin D/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6)-retinoblastoma protein (RB) pathway plays a key role in the proliferation of both normal breast epithelium and breast cancer cells. A strong rationale for inhibiting CDK4/6 in breast cancers has been present for many years. However, potent and selective CDK4/6 inhibitors have only recently become available. These agents prevent phosphorylation of the RB tumor suppressor, thereby invoking cancer cell cycle arrest in G1. CDK4/6 inhibitors have transited rapidly from preclinical studies to the clinical arena, and three have already been approved for the treatment of advanced, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients on account of striking clinical trial results demonstrating substantial improvements in progression-free survival. ER-positive breast cancers harbor several molecular features that would predict their sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors. As physicians gain experience with using these agents in the clinic, new questions arise: are CDK4/6 inhibitors likely to be useful for patients with other subtypes of breast cancer? Are there other agents that could be effectively combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors, beyond endocrine therapy? Is there a rationale for combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with novel immune-based therapies? In this review, we describe not only the clinical data available to date, but also the biology of the CDK4/6 pathway and discuss answers to these questions. In particular, we highlight that CDK4 and CDK6 govern much more than the cancer cell cycle, and that their optimal use in the clinic depends on a deeper understanding of the less well characterized effects of these enzymes.

Keywords: CDK4/6 inhibitors; HER2-positive; PI3K inhibitors; breast cancer; immune checkpoint blockade; predictors of response/resistance; triple-negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: S. Pernas has received honoraria for talks and travel grants from Roche, outside of the submitted work, and has served on advisory boards for Polyphor. S. Goel performs laboratory research sponsored by Eli Lilly and serves as a paid adviser to Eli Lilly. S. Tolaney receives institutional research funding from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Exelixis, Eisai, Merck, Bristol Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Nektar. S. Tolaney has also served on advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Eisai, Merck, AstraZeneca, Nektar, and Puma. E Winer has been a consultant to Roche and Eli Lilly.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The role of the cyclin D1–CDK4/6–RB pathway in breast cancer. The role of the cyclin D1–CDK4/6-RB pathway in breast cancer cells, including cross talk with other oncogenic signaling pathways. Mitogenic forces including ER transcriptional activity and signaling through ERBB2/PI3K/AKT/mTOR increase cyclin D1 levels, activating CDK4/6 and promoting cellular progression to the S phase. There is extensive crosstalk between the PI3K and CDK4/6 pathways: not only does PI3K pathway activity increase cyclin D1 levels, but the cyclin D–CDK4/6 complex can modulate TSC2 phosphorylation and hence mTORC1 activity. Combined inhibition of CDK4/6 and nodes in the PI3K pathway can thus maximally suppress mTORC1 activity as well as RB phosphorylation, inhibiting two promoters of S phase progression. Furthermore, suppression of E2F activity can modulate the tumor cell epigenome, rendering tumor cells more immunogenic and providing a rationale for CDK4/6-immunotherapy combinations. AR, androgen receptor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PI3K, phosphoinositide-3-kinase; RB, retinoblastoma protein, TSC2, tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (tuberin).

Comment in

References

    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–674. - PubMed
    1. Arnold A, Papanikolaou A. Cyclin D1 in breast cancer pathogenesis. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4215–4224. - PubMed
    1. Yu Q, Geng Y, Sicinski P. Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 ablation. Nature 2001; 411: 1017–1021. - PubMed
    1. Yu Q, Sicinska E, Geng Y, et al. Requirement for CDK4 kinase function in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2006; 9: 23–32. - PubMed
    1. Sharpless NE, Sherr CJ. Forging a signature of in vivo senescence. Nat Rev Cancer 2015; 15: 397–408. - PubMed