Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 24;9(1):2898.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05113-8.

NIR-II nanoprobes in-vivo assembly to improve image-guided surgery for metastatic ovarian cancer

Affiliations

NIR-II nanoprobes in-vivo assembly to improve image-guided surgery for metastatic ovarian cancer

Peiyuan Wang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure for patients with solid tumors. Tumor-specific intraoperative fluorescence imaging may improve staging and debulking efforts in cytoreductive surgery and, thereby improve prognosis. Here, we report in vivo assembly of the second near-infrared window (NIR-II) emitting downconversion nanoparticles (DCNPs) modified with DNA and targeting peptides to improve the image-guided surgery for metastatic ovarian cancer. The NIR-II imaging quality with DCNPs is superior to that of clinically approved ICG with good photostability and deep tissue penetration (8 mm). Stable tumor retention period experienced 6 h by in vivo assembly of nanoprobes can be used for precise tumor resection. Superior tumor-to-normal tissue ratio is successfully achieved to facilitate the abdominal ovarian metastases surgical delineation. Metastases with ≤1 mm can be completely excised under NIR-II bioimaging guidance. This novel technology provides a general new basis for the future design of nanomaterials for medical applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of NIR-II nanoprobes fabrication for ovarian metastasis surgery under NIR-II bioimaging guidance. Schematic of stepwise fabrication of DNA and FSHβ modified DCNPs (DCNPs-L1-FSHβ) and in vivo assembly of DCNPs-L1-FSHβ (first injection) and DCNPs-L2-FSHβ (second injection) with improved tumor targeting and rapid hepatic and renal clearance after two-staged in sequence injections. Metastatic ovarian tumors can be clearly observed and precisely removed with NIR-II image-guided surgery
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
In vitro assembly of NIR-II nanoprobes. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of as-made NaGdF4: 5% Nd@NaGdF4 nanocrystals (a), DNA (L1) modified DCNPs (b) and DNA complementary induced assembly between DCNPs-L1-FSHβ and DCNPs-L2-FSHβ in PBS (c). d The NIR-II fluorescence spectrum of DCNPs, DCNPs-L1-FSHβ, and self-assembled DCNPs. Inset, NIR-II fluorescence images of the corresponding samples. e Size distribution of DCNPs, DCNPs-L1-FSHβ, and self-assembled DCNPs determined by dynamic light scattering. f, g Photostability of DCNPs (f) and ICG (g) in a variety of biological media at 37 °C under continuous 808 nm laser exposure at a power density of 0.2 W cm−2. h NIR-II fluorescence images show complete attenuation of NIR-I light (ICG) by 3 mm, while NIR-II signals (DCNPs) are able to be detected through 8 mm of phantom tissues. Representative images are for n = 5 per group. i Signal to background ratios of DCNPs and ICG as a function of tissue phantom depth. Scale bars represent 10 nm in a, b and 50 nm in (c). Mean ± s.d. for n = 5 (*P < 0.05 vs. ICG, two-sided Student’s t test)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
In vivo assembly of NIR-II nanoprobes. a NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging (1000 nm long-pass filter) of the nude mice with murine epidermal tumor by single caudal vein first injection and two-staged in sequence injection (first + second) (interval between two injection is 8 h) under 808 nm excitation (fluence rate = 40 mW cm−2). The concentration of DCNPs in single injection is same to the sum of that for two-staged injection. Liver distribution of nanoprobes (b), tumor targeting efficiency (c), and T/N ratio (d) with single first injection and two-staged in sequence injection, respectively. The red dotted line in d indicates the Rose criterion. (*P < 0.05 vs. first, two-sided Student’s t test). e Fluorescence images of DCNPs-L1(Cy5)-FSHβ + DCNPs-L2(Cy7)-FSHβ (i) and DCNPs-L1(Cy5)-FSHβ + DCNPs-L1(Cy7)-FSHβ (ii) in epidermal tumor of the nude mice and the corresponding harvest organs, blood and tumors (left to right and to bottom: heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, tumor, and blood). f T/N ratio of the in vivo assembly (first + second), active targeting (DCNPs-L1-RGD + DCNPs-L2-RGD), passive targeting (DCNPs-L1 + DCNPs-L2), and preassembly (first + second) groups. (*P < 0.05 vs. DCNPs-L1-RGD + DCNP-L2-RGD, two-sided Student’s t test). g Blood circulation and urine excretion of nanoprobes after second injection. The T/N ratio is tumor-to-liver ratio in this epidermal tumor model experiments. All scale bars, 1 cm. Representative images are for n = 5 per group. Mean ± s.d. for n = 5
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Optimal surgery time window of in vivo assembly. a Comparison of MRI and NIR-II fluorescence imaging (1000 nm long-pass filter) of subcutaneous human ovarian adenocarcinoma. b Correlation for the tumor size ratio between MRI and NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging method. c Tumor retention of assembled DCNPs from 20 to 30 h PI. d H&E staining results of the tumors resected in 20–28 h PI under NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging guidance. e NIR-II fluorescence image-guided tumor surgery with the guided dose of clinic approved ICG probe (1.5 mg kg−1). Tumor margin was confirmed by the H&E staining result. Scale bars, 5 mm in NIR-II bioimaging and MRI results, 0.2 mm in H&E staining images. Representative images are for n = 5 per group. Mean ± s.d. for n = 5
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
NIR-II image-guided surgery. a Optical photo of human ovarian adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastases model (i), the corresponding NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging (1000 nm long-pass filter) results obtained at 22 h PI (ii) and the enlargement of the NIR-II nanoprobes labeled large peritoneal metastatic tumors (Nos. 1–8) and ultrasmall lesions (Nos. 9–13) (iii). Scale bar, 1 cm. b T/N ratios plotted as a function of different labeled peritoneal metastatic tumors, red dotted line is according to the Rose criterion. c H&E staining results of tumor margin in Nos. 1–8 (scale bars, 0.2 mm) and metastatic lesions in Nos. 9–13 (scale bars, 0.5 mm). Tumors were resected under NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging guidance in a. d NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging results of the popliteal lymph node metastasis at 22 h PI. Scale bar, 1 cm. e T/N ratios plotted as a function of different PI of the first injection, red dotted line is according to the Rose criterion. f H&E staining results of popliteal lymph node metastasis (Scale bar, 0.5 mm). Tumors were resected under NIR-II fluorescence bioimaging guidance in d. The T/N ratio is tumor-to-normal peripheral tissue ratio in this peritoneal metastases model and popliteal lymph node metastasis model experiments. Representative images are for n = 5 per model. Mean ± s.d. for n = 5

References

    1. Mai KT, Yazdi HM, Isotalo PA. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2000;60:29–33. doi: 10.1023/A:1006359308505. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am. J. Surg. 2004;188:399–402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1040–1044. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9308-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rizzo M, et al. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2010;228:228–234. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0643-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chrysafis A, et al. Imaging of liver tumors using surface-enhanced raman scattering nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2016;10:5015–5026. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07200. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types