Effect of Escitalopram vs Placebo Treatment for Depression on Long-term Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 30043065
- PMCID: PMC6583706
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.9422
Effect of Escitalopram vs Placebo Treatment for Depression on Long-term Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Erratum in
-
Incorrect Data in Figures.JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2154. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15103. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30480707 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Depression has been associated with poorer medical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there are few data on the effects of antidepressant treatment on long-term prognosis.
Objective: To investigate the effect on long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of escitalopram treatment of depression in patients with recent ACS.
Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted among 300 patients with recent ACS and depression enrolled from May 2007 to March 2013, with follow-up completed in June 2017, at Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either escitalopram in flexible dosages of 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/d (n = 149) or matched placebo (n = 151) for 24 weeks.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Four secondary outcomes were the individual MACE components of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, MI, and PCI. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the escitalopram and placebo groups by time to first MACE.
Results: Among 300 randomized patients (mean age, 60 years; 119 women [39.3%]), 100% completed a median of 8.1 (interquartile range, 7.5-9.0) years of follow-up. MACE occurred in 61 patients (40.9%) receiving escitalopram and in 81 (53.6%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96; P = .03). Comparing individual MACE outcomes between the escitalopram and placebo groups, respectively, incidences for all-cause mortality were 20.8% vs 24.5% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.33; P = .43), for cardiac death, 10.7% vs 13.2% (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.41-1.52; P = .48); for MI, 8.7% vs 15.2% (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27-0.96; P = .04), and for PCI, 12.8% vs 19.9% (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.04; P = .07).
Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with depression following recent acute coronary syndrome, 24-week treatment with escitalopram compared with placebo resulted in a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events after a median of 8.1 years. Further research is needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00419471.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Comment in
-
Cardiac Outcomes After Treatment for Depression in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2151. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15922. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30480718 No abstract available.
-
Cardiac Outcomes After Treatment for Depression in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2151-2152. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15930. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30480720 No abstract available.
-
Cardiac Outcomes After Treatment for Depression in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2152. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15934. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30480721 No abstract available.
References
-
- Lespérance F, Frasure-Smith N, Talajic M, Bourassa MG. Five-year risk of cardiac mortality in relation to initial severity and one-year changes in depression symptoms after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1049-1053. - PubMed
-
- Pizzi C, Rutjes AW, Costa GM, et al. . Meta-analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with depression and coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(7):972-979. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical