Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):350-358.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9422.

Effect of Escitalopram vs Placebo Treatment for Depression on Long-term Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Escitalopram vs Placebo Treatment for Depression on Long-term Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Jae-Min Kim et al. JAMA. .

Erratum in

  • Incorrect Data in Figures.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2154. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15103. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30480707 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Depression has been associated with poorer medical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there are few data on the effects of antidepressant treatment on long-term prognosis.

Objective: To investigate the effect on long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of escitalopram treatment of depression in patients with recent ACS.

Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted among 300 patients with recent ACS and depression enrolled from May 2007 to March 2013, with follow-up completed in June 2017, at Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either escitalopram in flexible dosages of 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/d (n = 149) or matched placebo (n = 151) for 24 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Four secondary outcomes were the individual MACE components of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, MI, and PCI. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the escitalopram and placebo groups by time to first MACE.

Results: Among 300 randomized patients (mean age, 60 years; 119 women [39.3%]), 100% completed a median of 8.1 (interquartile range, 7.5-9.0) years of follow-up. MACE occurred in 61 patients (40.9%) receiving escitalopram and in 81 (53.6%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96; P = .03). Comparing individual MACE outcomes between the escitalopram and placebo groups, respectively, incidences for all-cause mortality were 20.8% vs 24.5% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.33; P = .43), for cardiac death, 10.7% vs 13.2% (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.41-1.52; P = .48); for MI, 8.7% vs 15.2% (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27-0.96; P = .04), and for PCI, 12.8% vs 19.9% (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.04; P = .07).

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with depression following recent acute coronary syndrome, 24-week treatment with escitalopram compared with placebo resulted in a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events after a median of 8.1 years. Further research is needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00419471.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Stewart reports receipt of research funding from Janssen and Roche and co-supervision of a PhD candidate with GlaxoSmithKline. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant Flow in the Escitalopram for Depression in Acute Coronary Syndrome Study
ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cumulative Incidence of MACE (Primary Outcome)
MACE indicates major adverse cardiac events, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous coronary intervention. Median follow-up was 8.1 (IQR, 7.0-9.0) years for the escitalopram group and 8.2 (IQR, 7.1-8.9) years for the placebo group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Cumulative Incidence of the Individual MACE Components of All-Cause Mortality, Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Cardiac death was defined as sudden death with no other explanation available, death due to arrhythmia or after myocardial infarction or heart failure, or death caused by heart surgery or endocarditis.

Comment in

References

    1. Rudisch B, Nemeroff CB. Epidemiology of comorbid coronary artery disease and depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54(3):227-240. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00587-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Talajic M. Depression following myocardial infarction: impact on 6-month survival. JAMA. 1993;270(15):1819-1825. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510150053029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lespérance F, Frasure-Smith N, Talajic M, Bourassa MG. Five-year risk of cardiac mortality in relation to initial severity and one-year changes in depression symptoms after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1049-1053. - PubMed
    1. Thombs BD, de Jonge P, Coyne JC, et al. . Depression screening and patient outcomes in cardiovascular care: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;300(18):2161-2171. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.667 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pizzi C, Rutjes AW, Costa GM, et al. . Meta-analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with depression and coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(7):972-979. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources