Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 1;79(3):323-329.
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001817.

Effect of Racial Inequities in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use on Racial Disparities in HIV Incidence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Modeling Study

Affiliations

Effect of Racial Inequities in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use on Racial Disparities in HIV Incidence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Modeling Study

William C Goedel et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. .

Abstract

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake has been slow among African American men who have sex with men (AAMSM) in the United States. We used an agent-based model (ABM) to simulate race-specific PrEP coverage to estimate their impact on racial disparities in HIV incidence among MSM in Atlanta, GA.

Methods: An ABM was constructed to simulate HIV transmission in a dynamic network of 10,000 MSM over 10 years, beginning in 2015. We modeled a base scenario with estimated PrEP coverage of 2.5% among AAMSM and 5.0% among white MSM (WMSM). We then compared HIV incidence over 10 years and calculated a disparity ratio of AAMSM to WMSM incidence rates across varying PrEP scale-up scenarios, with equal and unequal coverage among AAMSM and WMSM.

Results: Assuming current coverage remains constant, the model predicts HIV incidence rates of 2.95 and 1.76 per 100 person-years among AAMSM and WMSM, respectively, with a disparity ratio of 1.68. If PrEP coverage was to increase 6-fold without addressing inequities in PrEP uptake, the model predicts incidences of 2.65 and 1.34, corresponding to a mean decrease of 10.4% and 24.0% in HIV incidence, respectively. This stronger benefit for WMSM increased the disparity ratio to 1.98. Equal PrEP coverage among AAMSM and WMSM resulted in lower incidence rates overall with lower disparity ratios.

Conclusions: Lower uptake among AAMSM relative to WMSM may limit the population-level impact of PrEP use among AAMSM, which may ultimately culminate in wider racial disparities in HIV incidence among MSM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percent reduction in HIV incidence among African American men who have sex with men (AAMSM) in Atlanta, Georgia (2015 to 2024) with increased pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) coverage, compared to a base case scenario where PrEP is unavailable
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percent reduction in HIV incidence among White men who have sex with men (WMSM) in Atlanta, Georgia (2015 to 2024) with increased pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) coverage, compared to a base case scenario where PrEP is unavailable

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnoses of HIV Infection in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2016. Atlanta, Georgia: National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention;2017.
    1. Hess KL, Hu X, Lansky A, Mermin J, Hall HI. Lifetime risk of a diagnosis of HIV infection in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(4):238–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: A meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):341–348. - PubMed
    1. Hall HI, Song R, Tang T, et al. HIV trends in the United States: Diagnoses and estimated incidence. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3(1):e8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–2599. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types