Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jul;21(4):E389-E399.

High Prevalence of Hypovitaminosis D in Patients with Low Back Pain: Evidence from Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 30045605
Free article
Meta-Analysis

High Prevalence of Hypovitaminosis D in Patients with Low Back Pain: Evidence from Meta-Analysis

Dipika Bansal et al. Pain Physician. 2018 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests an association between vitamin D deficiency and low back pain (LBP).

Objective: To pool evidence on the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in patients with LBP.

Study design: Meta-analysis.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was done in PubMed, Cochrane Database, and Google scholar for observational studies including cohort, cross sectional (CS), and case control (CC) evaluating the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in LBP patients. The primary outcome assessed was a prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in patients with LBP, presented as weighted pooled prevalence ratio (WPPR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random effects model. Heterogeneity and inconsistency of the measurements were identified through Cochran's Q statistic and I² statistic. We also performed sensitivity analysis, publication bias (using funnel plot and Begg's test), and subgroup analysis.

Results: Fourteen studies (6 were CC, 6 CS, and 2 cohort) involving 2602 patients were included in the final analysis. The WPPR (95% CI) of hypovitaminosis D in patients with LBP was found to be 0.72 (0.60-0.83). Marked heterogeneity was observed, median quality score of all studies was 7.5 interquartile range (IQR) (6.2 - 8.7) on a scale of 0 to 11. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the results. The WPPR of hypovitaminosis D was lower in CS at 0.60 (0.35-0.85) as compared to CC studies at 0.81 (0.72-0.90) (P < 0.01). The WPPR was lower in men at 0.74 (0.63-0.86) as compared to women at 0.84 (0.78-0.89) (P < 0.01). No publication bias was observed.

Limitations: Heterogeneity in the cut off level of vitamin D to classify the included patients as vitamin D deficient.

Conclusions: The high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was observed in patients with LBP. This provides a chance to screen the deficiency and correct it by supplementation, which can be therapeutic adjunct in the management of LBP patients.

Key words: Low back pain, hypovitaminosis D, meta-analysis, pooled prevalence, systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types