Isolated Tearing and Avulsion of the Distal Biceps Femoris Tendon During Sporting Activities: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 30046626
- PMCID: PMC6055306
- DOI: 10.1177/2325967118781828
Isolated Tearing and Avulsion of the Distal Biceps Femoris Tendon During Sporting Activities: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Isolated tearing and avulsions of the distal biceps femoris sustained during sporting activities are uncommon.
Purpose: To systematically review the literature to identify distal biceps femoris tears and avulsions experienced during sporting activities to determine injury prevalence, sporting activities/mechanisms, management, and time to return to sport.
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted investigating studies published between January 1970 and December 2017 that reported on athletes sustaining tears and avulsions of the distal biceps femoris during sporting activity. The review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and used the PubMed, Biosis Previews, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting on (1) partial or complete tears and avulsions of the distal biceps femoris with documented sporting activity causing injury, (2) injury management (operative vs nonoperative), and (3) patient outcome. Exclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting on (1) distal biceps femoris injuries without tearing, (2) injuries secondary to nonsporting activities (mechanical falls, trauma), (3) concomitant injuries to adjacent structures about the knee, and (4) studies not reporting injury management or patient outcomes. Sporting activities, injury characteristics, management, and time to return to sport were analyzed.
Results: A total of 22 athletes with isolated distal biceps femoris tears or avulsions were identified. Injuries were predominantly associated with noncontact knee hyperextension with concurrent hip flexion during soccer or track and field, most commonly isolated to the musculotendinous junction. Injuries were treated surgically in 91% (20/22) of athletes. Mean (±SD) overall time to return to sport was 4.9 ± 3.3 months, and for athletes who underwent operative repair, there were no significant postoperative differences based on injury location (musculotendinous junction vs avulsion, P = .25) or injury severity (partial vs complete injury, P = .13).
Conclusion: Isolated distal biceps femoris injuries occurred primarily via noncontact mechanisms. The majority of cases were treated surgically, with successful return to sport at preinjury levels. No significant difference in return to sport was appreciated based on injury location or severity. Further studies are necessary to determine the impact of treatment method.
Keywords: avulsion; biceps femoris; distal hamstrings; knee hyperextension; return to sport; tearing.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: J.E.V. is a paid consultant for Arthrex, Stryker, and Linvatec.
Figures
References
-
- Ahmad CS, Redler LH, Ciccotti MG, Maffulli N, Longo UG, Bradley J. Evaluation and management of hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2933–2947. - PubMed
-
- Aldebeyan S, Boily M, Martineau PA. Complete tear of the distal hamstring tendons in a professional football player: a case report and review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45(3):427–430. - PubMed
-
- Ali K, Leland JM. Hamstring strains and tears in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(2):263–272. - PubMed
-
- Alzahrani MM, Aldebeyan S, Abduljabbar F, Martineau PA. Hamstring injuries in athletes: diagnosis and treatment. JBJS Rev. 2015;3(6). - PubMed
-
- Askling C, Karlsson J, Thorstensson A. Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):244–250. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources