Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0200785.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200785. eCollection 2018.

Identification of 613 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and a polygenic risk score for bone mineral density, osteoporosis and fracture

Affiliations

Identification of 613 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and a polygenic risk score for bone mineral density, osteoporosis and fracture

Stuart K Kim. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Low bone mineral density (BMD) leads to osteoporosis, and is a risk factor for bone fractures, including stress fractures. Using data from UK Biobank, a genome-wide association study identified 1,362 independent SNPs that clustered into 899 loci of which 613 are new. These data were used to train a genetic algorithm using 22,886 SNPs as predictors and showing a correlation with heel bone mineral density of 0.415. Combining this genetic algorithm with height, weight, age and sex resulted in a correlation with heel bone mineral density of 0.496. Individuals with low scores (2.2% of total) showed a change in BMD of -1.16 T-score units, an increase in risk for osteoporosis of 17.4 fold and an increase in risk for fracture of 1.87 fold. Genetic predictors could assist in the identification of individuals at risk for osteoporosis or fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Quantile-quantile plot for genome-wide association analysis of eBMD.
The expected versus observed log transformed values for the 20,259,828 p-values from the LMM analysis are graphed. The y-axis shows the observed p-values and the x-axis shows the p-values expected by chance. The black dots represent the SNPs arranged by their observed p-values and the red line shows the expected trajectory if the SNPs had p-values expected by chance.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Manhattan plot for genome-wide association analysis of eBMD.
The -log10 p-values for association with eBMD of SNPs from the LMM analysis are plotted by genomic position with chromosome number listed across the bottom. The y-axis shows the -log10 p-value for association with eBMD. The blue line represents suggestive genome-wide significance (p<5x10-5) and the red line represents genome-wide significance (p<6.6x10-9).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Regional-association plots for eBMD.
A. Locus 385. B. Locus 324. C. Locus 336. D. Locus 89. Tested SNPs are arranged by genomic position (x-axis) around the lead SNP (purple diamond). The y-axis on the left indicates -log10 p-values for association with eBMD for each SNP. The y-axis on the right indicates recombination rate shown with a blue line. The color of dots of the flanking SNPs indicates their linkage disequilibrium (R2) with the lead SNP as indicated by the heat map color key.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relationship between effect size and minor allele frequency.
Shown is a scatterplot of 1362 SNPs with an independent association with eBMD. The x-axis is the minor allele frequency. The y-axis is the absolute value of the beta coefficient from the joint and conditional analysis.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Analysis of predictors used in LASSO4.
A. Histogram of p-values used by predictors in LASSO4. X-axis shows the–Log10 of the p-value for association with eBMD from cohort A, from p = 10−2 to p = 10−8. Inset shows data for all p-values used in LASSO4. B. Plot of cumulative score from predictors in LASSO4. X-axis is a running total of number of predictors and y-axis is the cumulative score (T-score units) from those predictors.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Prediction of eBMD, osteoporosis risk and fracture risk using the LASSO4 score.
A. Comparison of LASSO4 with A. eBMD, B. osteoporosis risk and C. fracture risk. Individuals from cohort C were ranked based on their risk score and placed into bins. Red dots show average eBMD (T score), osteoporosis risk and fracture risk (left y-axes). Gray bars show number of individuals in each bin (right y-axis). Lowest risk score for each bin is shown on the x-axis. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Prediction of eBMD, osteoporosis risk and fracture risk using the BOG score.
A. Comparison of the BOG risk score with A. eBMD, B. osteoporosis risk and C. fracture risk. Individuals from cohort C were ranked based on their risk score and placed into bins. Red dots show average eBMD (T score), osteoporosis risk and fracture risk (left y-axes). Gray bars show number of individuals in each bin (right y-axis). Risk score for each bin is shown on the x-axis. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Receiver Operator and box plots for PRS’s for osteoporosis risk.
A. Receiver Operator plot for the LASSO4 PRS for osteoporosis. B. Box plot for the LASSO 4 PRS. C. Receiver Operator curve for the BOG score for osteoporosis. D. Box plot for the BOG score. AUC; Area Under the Curve. Box plots show the maximum, first quartile, mean, third quartile and minimum scores for LASSO4 and BOG for osteoporosis cases and controls.

Similar articles

  • Genetic determinants of heel bone properties: genome-wide association meta-analysis and replication in the GEFOS/GENOMOS consortium.
    Moayyeri A, Hsu YH, Karasik D, Estrada K, Xiao SM, Nielson C, Srikanth P, Giroux S, Wilson SG, Zheng HF, Smith AV, Pye SR, Leo PJ, Teumer A, Hwang JY, Ohlsson C, McGuigan F, Minster RL, Hayward C, Olmos JM, Lyytikäinen LP, Lewis JR, Swart KM, Masi L, Oldmeadow C, Holliday EG, Cheng S, van Schoor NM, Harvey NC, Kruk M, del Greco M F, Igl W, Trummer O, Grigoriou E, Luben R, Liu CT, Zhou Y, Oei L, Medina-Gomez C, Zmuda J, Tranah G, Brown SJ, Williams FM, Soranzo N, Jakobsdottir J, Siggeirsdottir K, Holliday KL, Hannemann A, Go MJ, Garcia M, Polasek O, Laaksonen M, Zhu K, Enneman AW, McEvoy M, Peel R, Sham PC, Jaworski M, Johansson Å, Hicks AA, Pludowski P, Scott R, Dhonukshe-Rutten RA, van der Velde N, Kähönen M, Viikari JS, Sievänen H, Raitakari OT, González-Macías J, Hernández JL, Mellström D, Ljunggren O, Cho YS, Völker U, Nauck M, Homuth G, Völzke H, Haring R, Brown MA, McCloskey E, Nicholson GC, Eastell R, Eisman JA, Jones G, Reid IR, Dennison EM, Wark J, Boonen S, Vanderschueren D, Wu FC, Aspelund T, Richards JB, Bauer D, Hofman A, Khaw KT, Dedoussis G, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Gyllensten U, Pramstaller PP, Lorenc RS, Cooper C, Kung AW, Lips P, Alen M, Attia J, Brandi ML, de Groot … See abstract for full author list ➔ Moayyeri A, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Jun 1;23(11):3054-68. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt675. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Hum Mol Genet. 2014. PMID: 24430505 Free PMC article.
  • Hyperthyroidism and bone mineral density: Dissecting the causal association with Mendelian randomization analysis.
    Deshmukh H, Papageorgiou M, Aye M, England J, Abdalla M, Sathyapalan T. Deshmukh H, et al. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2021 Jan;94(1):119-127. doi: 10.1111/cen.14330. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2021. PMID: 32947644
  • Bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and osteoporotic fractures: a genome-wide association study.
    Richards JB, Rivadeneira F, Inouye M, Pastinen TM, Soranzo N, Wilson SG, Andrew T, Falchi M, Gwilliam R, Ahmadi KR, Valdes AM, Arp P, Whittaker P, Verlaan DJ, Jhamai M, Kumanduri V, Moorhouse M, van Meurs JB, Hofman A, Pols HA, Hart D, Zhai G, Kato BS, Mullin BH, Zhang F, Deloukas P, Uitterlinden AG, Spector TD. Richards JB, et al. Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1505-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60599-1. Lancet. 2008. PMID: 18455228 Free PMC article.
  • Dissecting the Genetics of Osteoporosis using Systems Approaches.
    Al-Barghouthi BM, Farber CR. Al-Barghouthi BM, et al. Trends Genet. 2019 Jan;35(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20. Trends Genet. 2019. PMID: 30470485 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Collaborative meta-analysis: associations of 150 candidate genes with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture.
    Richards JB, Kavvoura FK, Rivadeneira F, Styrkársdóttir U, Estrada K, Halldórsson BV, Hsu YH, Zillikens MC, Wilson SG, Mullin BH, Amin N, Aulchenko YS, Cupples LA, Deloukas P, Demissie S, Hofman A, Kong A, Karasik D, van Meurs JB, Oostra BA, Pols HA, Sigurdsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Soranzo N, Williams FM, Zhou Y, Ralston SH, Thorleifsson G, van Duijn CM, Kiel DP, Stefansson K, Uitterlinden AG, Ioannidis JP, Spector TD; Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis Consortium. Richards JB, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 20;151(8):528-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00006. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19841454 Free PMC article.

Cited by

References

    1. Cauley JA, Hochberg MC, Lui LY, Palermo L, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, et al. (2007) Long-term risk of incident vertebral fractures. JAMA 298: 2761–2767. 10.1001/jama.298.23.2761 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM, Felsenberg D, Roux C, Barkmann R, et al. (2004) Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study. J Bone Miner Res 19: 782–793. 10.1359/JBMR.040304 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fredericson M, Jennings F, Beaulieu C, Matheson GO (2006) Stress fractures in athletes. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17: 309–325. 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180421c8c - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nattiv A (2000) Stress fractures and bone health in track and field athletes. J Sci Med Sport 3: 268–279. - PubMed
    1. Jones BH, Knapik JJ (1999) Physical training and exercise-related injuries. Surveillance, research and injury prevention in military populations. Sports Med 27: 111–125. - PubMed

Publication types