Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 26;8(8):129.
doi: 10.3390/ani8080129.

Spotlight on Assistance Dogs-Legislation, Welfare and Research

Annika Bremhorst  1   2 , Paolo Mongillo  3 , Tiffani Howell  4 , Lieta Marinelli  5
Affiliations
Review

Spotlight on Assistance Dogs-Legislation, Welfare and Research

Annika Bremhorst et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Assistance dogs are a very diverse group of working dogs that are trained to assist humans with different types of disabilities in their daily lives. Despite these dogs' value for humankind, research on their welfare status, cognitive and behavioural capacities, selection criteria for the best fitting individuals, effective training and management practices, and genetic issues are so far lacking. This review highlights the need to address these topics and to promote progress in legal issues around assistance dogs. The topic of assistance dogs is approached comprehensively by outlining the current status of knowledge in three different dimensions: (1) the legal dimension, outlining important legal issues in the EU and Australia; (2) the welfare dimension; and (3) the dimension of research, covering assistance dog selection and training. For each of these three dimensions, we discuss potential approaches that can be implemented in the future in order to support assistance dog working performance, to protect the dogs' welfare, and to improve our knowledge about them. Additionally, there remain many legal issues, such as the presence of assistance dogs in public areas, the resolution of which would benefit both the assistance dog and the owner with disability.

Keywords: assistance dog; behaviour; cognition; dog; genetics; guide dog; legislation; selection; training; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Audrestch H.M., Whelan C.T., Grice D., Asher L., England G.C.W., Freeman S.L. Recognizing the value of assistance dogs in society. Disabil. Health J. 2015;8:469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sachs-Ericsson N., Hansen N.K., Fitzgerald S. Benefits of assistance dogs: a review. Rehabil. Psychol. 2002;47:251–277. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.47.3.251. - DOI
    1. Stace L.B. Welcoming max: increasing pediatric provider knowledge of service dogs. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2016;24:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkle M., Crowe T.K., Hendrix I. Service dogs and people with physical disabilities partnerships: A systematic review. Occup. Ther. Int. 2012;19:54–66. doi: 10.1002/oti.323. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiss E., Greenberg G. Service dog selection tests: Effectiveness for dogs from animal shelters. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997;53:29–308. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01176-8. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources