Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 1;76(10):747-764.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy027.

Review of a priori dietary quality indices in relation to their construction criteria

Affiliations
Review

Review of a priori dietary quality indices in relation to their construction criteria

Christine Burggraf et al. Nutr Rev. .

Abstract

A multitude of indices measure the healthiness of dietary patterns. Because validation results with respect to health outcomes do not sufficiently facilitate the choice of a specific dietary quality index, the decision of which index to use for a particular research objective should be based on other criteria. This review aims to provide guidance on which criteria to focus upon when choosing a dietary index for a specific research question. A review of 57 existing specifications of dietary quality indices was conducted, taking explicitly into account relevant construction criteria explicated in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development handbook on constructing composite indicators. Index construction choices regarding the following criteria were extracted: theoretical framework, indicator selection, normalization and valuation functions, and aggregation methods. Preferable features of dietary indices are discussed, and a summarizing toolbox is provided to help identify indices with the most appropriate construction features for the respective study aim and target region and with regard to the available database. Directions for future efforts in the specification of new diet quality indices are given.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kant AK. Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:615–635. - PubMed
    1. InterAct Consortium. Adherence to predefined dietary patterns and incident type 2 diabetes in European populations: ePIC-InterAct Study. Diabetologia. 2014;57:321–333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newby P, Tucker KL.. Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev. 2004;62:177–203. - PubMed
    1. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13:3–9. - PubMed
    1. Gerber M, D Scali J, Michaud A, et al. Profiles of a healthful diet and its relationship to biomarkers in a population sample from Mediterranean southern France. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1164–1171. - PubMed

Publication types