Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 Jun;28(3):268-274.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000355. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

Is psychotherapy effective? A re-analysis of treatments for depression

Affiliations
Comment

Is psychotherapy effective? A re-analysis of treatments for depression

T Munder et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

AimsThe aim of this study was to reanalyse the data from Cuijpers et al.'s (2018) meta-analysis, to examine Eysenck's claim that psychotherapy is not effective. Cuijpers et al., after correcting for bias, concluded that the effect of psychotherapy for depression was small (standardised mean difference, SMD, between 0.20 and 0.30), providing evidence that psychotherapy is not as effective as generally accepted.

Methods: The data for this study were the effect sizes included in Cuijpers et al. (2018). We removed outliers from the data set of effects, corrected for publication bias and segregated psychotherapy from other interventions. In our study, we considered wait-list (WL) controls as the most appropriate estimate of the natural history of depression without intervention.

Results: The SMD for all interventions and for psychotherapy compared to WL controls was approximately 0.70, a value consistent with past estimates of the effectiveness of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy was also more effective than care-as-usual (SMD = 0.31) and other control groups (SMD = 0.43).

Conclusions: The re-analysis reveals that psychotherapy for adult patients diagnosed with depression is effective.

Keywords: Depression; Eysenck; meta-analysis; natural history; psychotherapy effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Effect sizes for psychological interventions for depression. Error bars represent standard errors. PT = psychotherapy. Overall is based on all effect sizes without outliers and corrected for publication bias (k = 146 contrasts with WL, k = 142 contrasts with CAU, k = 65 contrasts with ‘other’ controls). PT for adult depression only includes (individual or group) psychotherapy for adults with a diagnosis of depression (k = 30 contrasts with WL, k = 29 contrasts with CAU, k = 12 contrasts with ‘other control’).

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Ahola P, Joensuu M, Knekt P, Lindfors O, Saarinen P, Tolmunen T, Valkonen-Korhonen M, Jääskeläinen T, Virtala E, Tiihonen J and Lehtonen J (2017) Effects of scheduled waiting for psychotherapy in patients with major depression. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 205, 611–617. - PubMed
    1. Armento ME (2012) Behavioral activation of religious behaviors: treating depressed college students with a randomized controlled trial (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
    1. Armijo-Olivo S, Ospina M, da Costa BR, Egger M, Saltaji H, Fuentes J and Cummings GG (2014) Poor reliability between cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials. PLoS One 9, e96920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baskin TW, Tierney SC, Minami T and Wampold BE (2003) Establishing specificity in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis of structural equivalence of placebo controls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 71, 973–979. - PubMed
    1. Benedetti F (2014) Placebo effects: Understanding the mechanisms in health and disease, 2nd Edn. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.