Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 27;10(8):396.
doi: 10.3390/v10080396.

Enzymes and Mechanisms Employed by Tailed Bacteriophages to Breach the Bacterial Cell Barriers

Affiliations
Review

Enzymes and Mechanisms Employed by Tailed Bacteriophages to Breach the Bacterial Cell Barriers

Sofia Fernandes et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Monoderm bacteria possess a cell envelope made of a cytoplasmic membrane and a cell wall, whereas diderm bacteria have and extra lipid layer, the outer membrane, covering the cell wall. Both cell types can also produce extracellular protective coats composed of polymeric substances like, for example, polysaccharidic capsules. Many of these structures form a tight physical barrier impenetrable by phage virus particles. Tailed phages evolved strategies/functions to overcome the different layers of the bacterial cell envelope, first to deliver the genetic material to the host cell cytoplasm for virus multiplication, and then to release the virion offspring at the end of the reproductive cycle. There is however a major difference between these two crucial steps of the phage infection cycle: virus entry cannot compromise cell viability, whereas effective virion progeny release requires host cell lysis. Here we present an overview of the viral structures, key protein players and mechanisms underlying phage DNA entry to bacteria, and then escape of the newly-formed virus particles from infected hosts. Understanding the biological context and mode of action of the phage-derived enzymes that compromise the bacterial cell envelope may provide valuable information for their application as antimicrobials.

Keywords: LysB; bacterial cell envelope; cell wall; depolymerase; endolysin; holin; lysin; peptidoglycan; proton motive force; spanin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the structure and composition of the bacterial cell envelope in Gram-positive bacteria (a), Gram-negative bacteria (b) and mycobacteria (c). CM, cytoplasmic membrane; CW, cell wall; OM, outer membrane; IMP, inner membrane proteins; PLs, phospholipids; PG, peptidoglycan; AG, arabinogalactan; LP, lipoprotein; CAP, covalently attached protein; LTA, lipoteichoic acids; SCWP, secondary cell wall polymers; WTA, wall teichoic acids; OMP, outer membrane protein; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MA, mycolic acids; GL, glycolipids; FL, free lipids. The S-layer and capsule are extracellular structures. Branched lipoaraninomannan is not represented in the mycobacterial cell envelope (probably anchored to both the CM and OM).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Basic structure of the bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan (PG). The possible enzymatic activities of PG-degrading enzymes and the bonds they cleave are indicated. m-DAP is found in the peptide chains of the PG of most Gram-negative bacteria, Bacillus spp. and Listeria spp., which present also direct m-DAP-d-Ala bonding between adjacent stem peptides. In most Gram-positive bacteria m-DAP is replaced l-Lys. Cross-linking between this residue and d-Ala of a neighbor peptide chain usually occurs by an interpeptide bridge of variable amino acidic composition (X). The d-Ala residue in light blue may be lost after PG maturation. Carboxypeptidases are rarely produced by bacteriophages. NAG, N-acetylglucosamine; NAM, N-acetylmuramic acid.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Possible actions of phage depolymerases during recognition and penetration of the bacterial cell envelope (Gram-negative bacteria used as example). Depolymerase activity is generically depicted as a pacman symbol. CM, cytoplasmic membrane; PG, cell wall peptidoglycan; OM, outer membrane; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; CA, capsule.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Key features of canonical (a) and non-canonical (b) lysis models. In the canonical model endolysins (c-endolysins) can only gain access to the CW compartment through the holin holes, which need therefore to be large enough to accommodate the enzymes’ size. In non-canonical lysis, host cell machineries (e.g., the bacterial Sec system) export the lytic enzymes (e-endolysins) to the extracytoplasmic space, where they are maintained inactive in association with the CW or the CM. Dissipation of the membrane PMF by the holin holes (canonical holins or pinholins) is an essential requirement for activation of e-endolysins. Recent evidences indicate that holin-mediated PMF collapse may also potentiate the lytic activity of c-endolysins (see text). CM, cytoplasmic membrane; PG, peptidoglycan.

Similar articles

  • Phage Lysis: Multiple Genes for Multiple Barriers.
    Cahill J, Young R. Cahill J, et al. Adv Virus Res. 2019;103:33-70. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Adv Virus Res. 2019. PMID: 30635077 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Phage lysis: three steps, three choices, one outcome.
    Young R. Young R. J Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):243-58. doi: 10.1007/s12275-014-4087-z. Epub 2014 Mar 1. J Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 24585055 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Bacteriophage and peptidoglycan degrading enzymes with antimicrobial applications.
    Donovan DM. Donovan DM. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2007;1(2):113-22. doi: 10.2174/187220807780809463. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2007. PMID: 19075835 Review.
  • Endolysin Regulation in Phage Mu Lysis.
    Chamblee JS, Ramsey J, Chen Y, Maddox LT, Ross C, To KH, Cahill JL, Young R. Chamblee JS, et al. mBio. 2022 Jun 28;13(3):e0081322. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00813-22. Epub 2022 Apr 26. mBio. 2022. PMID: 35471081 Free PMC article.
  • Enterococcal Bacteriophages and Genome Defense.
    Duerkop BA, Palmer KL, Horsburgh MJ. Duerkop BA, et al. 2014 Feb 11. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection [Internet]. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; 2014–. 2014 Feb 11. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection [Internet]. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; 2014–. PMID: 24649501 Free Books & Documents. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Carter J., Saunders V. Virology: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. Wiley & Sons Inc.; New York, NY, USA: 2013.
    1. Poranen M.M., Daugelavicius R., Bamford D.H. Common principles in viral entry. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002;56:521–538. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160643. - DOI - PubMed
    1. São-José C., Nascimento J., Parreira R., Santos M. Release of progeny phages from infected cells. In: McGrath S., van Sinderen D., editors. Bacteriophage: Genetics and Molecular Biology. Caister Academic Press; Norfolk, UK: 2007. pp. 307–333.
    1. Krupovic M., Prangishvili D., Hendrix R.W., Bamford D.H. Genomics of bacterial and archaeal viruses: Dynamics within the prokaryotic virosphere. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011;75:610–635. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00011-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clokie M.R., Millard A.D., Letarov A.V., Heaphy S. Phages in nature. Bacteriophage. 2011;1:31–45. doi: 10.4161/bact.1.1.14942. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources