Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 28;7(8):89.
doi: 10.3390/cells7080089.

New Insights into the Occurrence of Matrix Metalloproteases -2 and -9 in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Proteomic Correlations

Affiliations

New Insights into the Occurrence of Matrix Metalloproteases -2 and -9 in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Proteomic Correlations

Gianluca Di Cara et al. Cells. .

Abstract

Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) are a family of well-known enzymes which operate prevalently in the extracellular domain, where they fulfil the function of remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM). Within the 26 family members, encoded by 24 genes in humans, MMP-2 and MMP-9 have been regarded as primarily responsible for the basement membrane and peri-cellular ECM rearrangement. In cases of infiltrating carcinomas, which arise from the epithelial tissues of a gland or of an internal organ, a marked alteration of the expression and the activity levels of both MMPs is known to occur. The present investigation represents the continuation and upgrading of our previous studies, now focusing on the occurrence and intensity levels of MMP-2 and -9 and their proteomic correlations in a cohort of 80 breast cancer surgical tissues.

Keywords: breast cancer; matrix metalloproteases; proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gelatin zymography of 30 selected breast cancer tissues (BCT) and their non-tumoral adjacent tissues (NAT). Samples were run in parallel with purified MMP-2 and MMP-9 as a standard (lanes STD). The higher molecular weight (MW) of the lytic bands were previously identified as MMP-9 dimers and MMP-9/TIMP-1 complexes [14].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Densitometric profiles of the gelatinolytic bands corresponding to pro-MMP-9 (a); MMP-9 (b); pro-MMP-2 (c); MMP-2 (d) in the 30 breast cancer tissues compared to the respective non-tumoral adjacent tissues. Note that the active forms of both the MMPs are absent or rarely present in the non-tumoral tissues.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gelatin zymographies of tissue extratcs from 80 breast cancer patients, showing a heterogeous level of the lytic bands. Gels were loaded with 18 ug of protein extracts and developed overnight at 37 °C, before staining with Coomassie-blue. Note the heterogeneous intensity level of the lytic bands among the patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Densitometric profiles of the gelatinolytic bands identified as pro-MMP-9 (a), MMP-9 (b), pro-MMP-2 (c), MMP-2 (d) in the 80 breast cancer tissues.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Interactome of the 274 genes coding for the 458 protein spots identified on the proteomic maps of the 80 breast cancer tissues selected for the study. The interactome was obtained by the software STRING, available online [18]. MMP-2 and MMP-9 were added to the list of 274 genes, in order to trace their predicted interactions with the proteomic profiles of the selected breast tissues.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Venn diagram representing the predicted direct interactions of MMP-9 and MMP-2 with protein identities within the 274 entries identified in the proteomic profiles of the 80 selected breast cancer tissues. The intersection of the two circles includes six identities shared by the two MMPs. In brackets are the reported second-level interactors for each putative partner.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Lists of the direct interactions of MMP-9 and MMP-2 with their putative partners at the primary level. The interacting proteins are distributed in the functional categories given by the databases. The lower panels show the interactors of MMP-9 (B) and MMP-2 (C), generated by and extracted from the STRING platform as shown in Figure 5.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics. 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hashim D., Boffetta P., La Vecchia C., Rota M., Bertuccio P., Malvezzi M., Negri E. The global decrease in cancer mortality: Trends and disparities. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:926–933. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turkoz F.P., Solak M., Petekkaya I., Keskin O., Kertmen N., Sarici F., Arik Z., Babacan T., Ozisik Y., Altundag K. Association between common risk factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2013;22:344–350. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caplan L. Delay in breast cancer: Implications for stage at diagnosis and survival. Front. Public Health. 2014;2:87. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pondé N., Brandão M., El-Hachem G., Werbrouck E., Piccart M. Treatment of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: 2018 and beyond. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;67:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.04.016. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources