Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;60(4):459-467.
doi: 10.1177/0284185118787356. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

Regional differences of fat depot attenuation using non-contrast, contrast-enhanced, and delayed-enhanced cardiac CT

Affiliations

Regional differences of fat depot attenuation using non-contrast, contrast-enhanced, and delayed-enhanced cardiac CT

Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo et al. Acta Radiol. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Regional fat density assessed by computed tomography (CT) has been suggested as a marker of perivascular adipose tissue inflammation. Dual energy CT (DECT) allows improved tissue characterization compared to conventional CT.

Purpose: To explore whether DECT might aid regional fat density discrimination.

Material and methods: We included patients who had completed a non-enhanced cardiac CT scan, CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and a delayed enhancement CT. Attenuation levels (Hounsfield units [HU]) were assessed at the epicardial, paracardial, visceral, and subcutaneous fat. The number of coronary segments with disease (SIS) was calculated.

Results: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-six (72%) patients had evidence of obstructive disease at CCTA and 25 (69%) patients had evidence of previous myocardial infarction. At non-contrast CT, we did not identify significant attenuation differences between epicardial, paracardial, subcutaneous, and visceral fat depots (-110.8 ± 9 HU, vs. -113.7 ± 9 HU, vs. -114.7 ± 8 HU, vs. -113.8 ± 11 HU, P = 0.36). Significant attenuation differences were detected between fat depots at mid and low energy levels, both at CTCA and delayed-enhancement scans ( P < 0.05 for all). Epicardial fat showed the least negative attenuation, irrespective of the acquisition mode; epicardial fat evaluated at 40 keV was related to the SIS (r = 0.37, P = 0.03).

Conclusions: In this study, regional fat depots amenable to examination during thoracic CT scans have distinctive regional attenuation values. Furthermore, such differences were better displayed using contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels.

Keywords: CT angiography; Cardiac; adipose tissue; arteriosclerosis; inflammation; tissue characterization.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources