The Complexity of Mental Health App Privacy Policies: A Potential Barrier to Privacy
- PMID: 30061090
- PMCID: PMC6090172
- DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9871
The Complexity of Mental Health App Privacy Policies: A Potential Barrier to Privacy
Abstract
Background: In 2017, the Supreme Court of India ruled that privacy is a fundamental right of every citizen. Although mobile phone apps have the potential to help people with noncommunicable diseases, such as diabetes and mental illness, they often contain complex privacy policies, which consumers may not understand. This complexity may impede the ability of consumers to make decisions regarding privacy, a critical issue due to the stigma of mental illness.
Objective: Our objective is to determine whether mental health apps have more complex privacy policies than diabetes apps.
Methods: The study used privacy policies extracted from apps. The apps pertained to diabetes or mental health, and were all of Indian origin. Privacy policy reading complexity was compared between the two types of apps using a series of 15 readability measures. The universe of applicable apps on the Google Play store, as viewed between May and June 2017, was considered. The measures of readability were compared using chi-square tests.
Results: No significant difference was found between the privacy policy readability of the diabetes apps versus the mental health apps for each of the measures considered. The mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 13.9 for diabetes apps and 13.6 for mental health apps; therefore, the mean policy grade level for both types of apps was written at a college level. Privacy policies in the 25th percentile of complexity were also written at a college level for both types of apps.
Conclusions: Privacy policy complexity may be a barrier for informed decision making.
Keywords: apps; ethics; mobile phone; privacy.
©Adam Powell, Preeti Singh, John Torous. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 30.07.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: AP reports employment at Payer+Provider Syndicate, scientific/medical advisory board member with the Mary Christie Foundation and PsyberGuide, and stock ownership of Payer+Provider Syndicate, Select Medical Holdings, Team Health Holdings, AmSurg Corp, Centene Corp, CVS Health Corp, Community Health Systems, HCA Holdings, Inc, Quorum Health Corporation, and Tenet Healthcare Corp. PS and JT have nothing to disclose. None of the authors have a direct conflict of interest with the study.
Figures
References
-
- AP News. 2017. Aug 25, [2018-05-04]. India’s Supreme Court rules privacy is a fundamental right https://apnews.com/12c1222843d24573a74388c3f68d1f69 .
-
- Charlson FJ, Baxter AJ, Cheng HG, Shidhaye R, Whiteford HA. The burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in China and India: a systematic analysis of community representative epidemiological studies. Lancet. 2016 Jul 23;388(10042):376–389. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30590-6.S0140-6736(16)30590-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Malik R. Times of India. 2016. Jan 28, [2018-05-04]. India is the diabetes capital of the world! https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health-new... .
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
