Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;31(4):561-566.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1009-7. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

The comparison of the 1972 Hodkinson's Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and its variants in screening for cognitive impairment

Affiliations

The comparison of the 1972 Hodkinson's Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and its variants in screening for cognitive impairment

Karolina Piotrowicz et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Since its introduction by Hodkinson in 1972, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and its English and other language versions have been widely used in research and clinical practice alike. However, whether the various versions of AMTS yield equivalent information has never been tested.

Methods: We performed cross-sectional assessment of inpatients aged 65+ years with seven AMTS versions and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) after correction for age and education (MMSEc). We used the MMSEc cut-off score of < 24 as comparator and fitted linear regression models from which we obtained the receiver operating characteristics, and further compared the c-statistics obtained for each version of AMTS. We used Spearman's correlation to check the relation between different AMTS versions.

Results: The mean (SD) age of 72 (52.8% women) patients was 76.2 (7.6) years. The average time spent on education was 11.3 (3.5) years. The AMTS score across versions varied between 7.4 (2.0) and 8.2 (1.7). The MMSE averaged 24.1 (4.6) and the MMSEc averaged 25.2 (4.1). We found that the c-statistic across AMTS versions with dichotomised MMSEc as comparator ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 and did not significantly differ from the c-statistic of 0.87 for original AMTS (all p > 0.16). We found AMTS versions to be significantly correlated (all r between 0.83 and 0.99, all p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: We found AMTS to be a reliable and useful tool in the screening for possible cognitive impairment. This seems to be true irrespective of whether we use the original test or any of its studied modifications.

Keywords: AMTS; Cognitive impairment; MMSE; Mental test; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was performed with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland (No.: 122.6120.191.2016).

Informed consent

All subjects gave their informed consent.

References

    1. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a Mental Test Score For Assessment of Mental Impairment in the Elderly. Age Ageing. 1972;1:35–40. - PubMed
    1. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. 1972. Age Ageing. 2012;41:iii35–iii40. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. (1993) Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 28
    1. (2002) Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 48
    1. Odor PM, Chis Ster I, Wilkinson I, et al. Effect of admission fascia iliaca compartment blocks on post-operative abbreviated mental test scores in elderly fractured neck of femur patients: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0297-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources