Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 1;79(3):339-346.
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001822.

Elevated HIV Prevalence and Correlates of PrEP Use Among a Community Sample of Black Men Who Have Sex With Men

Lisa A Eaton  1 , Derrick D Matthews, Leigh A Bukowski  2 , M Ruvel Friedman, Cristian J Chandler  2 , Darren L Whitfield  3 , Jordan M Sang  2 , Ron D Stall  2 ; POWER Study Team
Affiliations

Elevated HIV Prevalence and Correlates of PrEP Use Among a Community Sample of Black Men Who Have Sex With Men

Lisa A Eaton et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. .

Abstract

Background: The HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) demands urgent public health attention. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly efficacious option for preventing HIV, but characteristics of PrEP use among community samples of BMSM are not well-understood.

Methods: A serial cross-sectional survey assessment (N = 4184 BMSM reporting HIV-negative/unsure status) and HIV testing were conducted at Black Gay Pride events in 6 US cities in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.

Results: HIV prevalence was higher among BMSM self-reporting current PrEP use (1 of 3 participants) than BMSM not self-reporting current PrEP use (1 of 5 participants) [32.3%, N = 103/319 vs. 20.0%, N = 639/3,193, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.15]. BMSM reporting current PrEP use (N = 380) were more likely to report having a greater number of male sex partners (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.03), a sexually transmitted infection diagnosis (aOR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.88 to 3.16), and stimulant drug use (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.47) when compared with BMSM not reporting current PrEP use (N = 3804). PrEP use increased from 4.7% (2014) to 15.5% (2017) (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.25). Among PrEP users, inability to afford health care coverage was associated with testing HIV-positive (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.24 to 3.56).

Conclusions: The high prevalence of HIV infection among BMSM reporting PrEP use is concerning. It does not, however, challenge the efficacy of PrEP itself but rather the uptake of the surrounding preventative package including behavioral risk reduction support, sexually transmitted infection treatment, and medication adherence counseling. Further research to understand barriers to fully effective PrEP is needed to guide operational and behavioral interventions that close the gap on incident infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest : No conflicts of interests were declared.

References

    1. CDC. HIV Among African Americans. HIV/AIDS. www.cdc.gov/hiv. January 15, 2017. 2016.
    1. Matthews DD, Herrick AL, Coulter RWS, et al. Running Backwards: Consequences of Current HIV Incidence Rates for the Next Generation of Black MSM in the United States. AIDS and behavior. 2016;20(1):7–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–2599. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rolle C-P, Rosenberg ES, Siegler AJ, et al. Challenges in Translating PrEP Interest Into Uptake in an Observational Study of Young Black MSM. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76(3):250–258. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calabrese SK, Krakower DS, Mayer KH. Integrating HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Into Routine Preventive Health Care to Avoid Exacerbating Disparities. Am J Public Health. December 2017;107(12):1883–1889. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types