Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul 31;20(7):e10756.
doi: 10.2196/10756.

Developing a Digital Marketplace for Family Planning: Pilot Randomized Encouragement Trial

Eric P Green  1 , Arun Augustine  1 , Violet Naanyu  2 , Anna-Karin Hess  1 , Lulla Kiwinda  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Developing a Digital Marketplace for Family Planning: Pilot Randomized Encouragement Trial

Eric P Green et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Family planning is an effective tool for preventing death among women who do not want to become pregnant and has been shown to improve newborn health outcomes, advance women's empowerment, and bring socioeconomic benefits through reductions in fertility and population growth. Yet among the populations that would benefit the most from family planning, uptake remains too low. The emergence of digital health tools has created new opportunities to strengthen health systems and promote behavior change. In this study, women with an unmet need for family planning in Western Kenya were randomized to receive an encouragement to try an automated investigational digital health intervention that promoted the uptake of family planning.

Objective: The objectives of the pilot study were to explore the feasibility of a full-scale trial-in particular, the recruitment, encouragement, and follow-up data collection procedures-and to examine the preliminary effect of the intervention on contraception uptake.

Methods: This pilot study tested the procedures for a randomized encouragement trial. We recruited 112 women with an unmet need for family planning from local markets in Western Kenya, conducted an eligibility screening, and randomized half of the women to receive an encouragement to try the investigational intervention. Four months after encouraging the treatment group, we conducted a follow-up survey with enrolled participants via short message service (SMS) text message.

Results: The encouragement sent via SMS text messages to the treatment group led to differential rates of intervention uptake between the treatment and control groups; however, uptake by the treatment group was lower than anticipated (19/56, 33.9% vs 1/56, 1.8%, in the control group). Study attrition was also substantial. We obtained follow-up data from 44.6% (50/112) of enrolled participants. Among those in the treatment group who tried the intervention, the instrumental variables estimate of the local average treatment effect was an increase in the probability of contraceptive uptake of 41.0 percentage points (95% uncertainty interval -0.03 to 0.85).

Conclusions: This randomized encouragement design and study protocol is feasible but requires modifications to the recruitment, encouragement, and follow-up data collection procedures.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03224390; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03224390 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70yitdJu8).

Keywords: Kenya; contraception; digital health; family planning; unmet need.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: EPG is a co-founder of Nivi, Inc, holds an equity stake in the company, is a member of the company’s Board of Directors, and serves as the company’s Chief Scientist. EPG is a faculty member in the Duke Global Health Institute. Duke University also holds an equity stake in the company. EPG’s potential conflicts of interest are managed by Duke University’s Research Integrity Office (MP#0600050-2017-001-A).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ, Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006 Oct 07;368(9543):1284–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.S0140-6736(06)69381-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1810–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4.S0140-6736(06)69480-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bongaarts J, Cleland J, Townsend J, Bertrand J, Gupta M. Family Planning Programs For the 21st Century. New York: Population Council; 2012. [2018-07-19]. http://www.popcouncil.org/research/family-planning-programs-for-the-21st... .
    1. Prata N, Fraser A, Huchko MJ, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, Ciaraldi EJ, Upadhyay UD. WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND FAMILY PLANNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. J Biosoc Sci. 2017 Nov;49(6):713–743. doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000663. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28069078 S0021932016000663 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silverman R, Birdsall N, Glassman A. Center for Global Development. 2016. [2018-04-05]. Can access to contraception deliver for women?s economic empowerment? What we know ? and what we must learn https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/Silverman-Birdsall-Glassman-Ac... .

Publication types

Associated data