Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 17:9:373.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00373. eCollection 2018.

Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper

Affiliations
Review

Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper

Stefan Pilz et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency can lead to musculoskeletal diseases such as rickets and osteomalacia, but vitamin D supplementation may also prevent extraskeletal diseases such as respiratory tract infections, asthma exacerbations, pregnancy complications and premature deaths. Vitamin D has a unique metabolism as it is mainly obtained through synthesis in the skin under the influence of sunlight (i.e., ultraviolet-B radiation) whereas intake by nutrition traditionally plays a relatively minor role. Dietary guidelines for vitamin D are based on a consensus that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations are used to assess vitamin D status, with the recommended target concentrations ranging from ≥25 to ≥50 nmol/L (≥10-≥20 ng/mL), corresponding to a daily vitamin D intake of 10 to 20 μg (400-800 international units). Most populations fail to meet these recommended dietary vitamin D requirements. In Europe, 25(OH)D concentrations <30 nmol/L (12 ng/mL) and <50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) are present in 13.0 and 40.4% of the general population, respectively. This substantial gap between officially recommended dietary reference intakes for vitamin D and the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the general population requires action from health authorities. Promotion of a healthier lifestyle with more outdoor activities and optimal nutrition are definitely warranted but will not erase vitamin D deficiency and must, in the case of sunlight exposure, be well balanced with regard to potential adverse effects such as skin cancer. Intake of vitamin D supplements is limited by relatively poor adherence (in particular in individuals with low-socioeconomic status) and potential for overdosing. Systematic vitamin D food fortification is, however, an effective approach to improve vitamin D status in the general population, and this has already been introduced by countries such as the US, Canada, India, and Finland. Recent advances in our knowledge on the safety of vitamin D treatment, the dose-response relationship of vitamin D intake and 25(OH)D levels, as well as data on the effectiveness of vitamin D fortification in countries such as Finland provide a solid basis to introduce and modify vitamin D food fortification in order to improve public health with this likewise cost-effective approach.

Keywords: evidence; food fortification; general population; guidelines; policy; public health; recommendations; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dose-response trend of hazard ratios of death from all causes by standardized serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Dose-response trend of hazard ratios of all-cause mortality by standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and season of blood drawing concentrations. Hazard ratios (blue line with 95% confidence intervals as dotted blue lines) are referring to the 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration of 83.4 nmol/L (i.e., the median 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration of the group with 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration from 75 to 99.99 nmol/L). Adopted from Gaksch et al. (28).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Guidance for vitamin D food fortification.

References

    1. Pilz S, Gaksch M, Hartaigh BÓ, Tomaschitz A, März W. Vitamin D in preventive medicine. Anticancer Res. (2015) 35:1161–70. 10.1079/BJN2003837 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fiscaletti M, Stewart P, Munns CF. The importance of vitamin D in maternal and child health: a global perspective. Public Health Rev. (2017) 38:19. 10.1186/s40985-017-0066-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holick MF. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. (2017) 18:153–65. 10.1007/s11154-017-9424-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayes A, Cashman KD. Food-based solutions for vitamin D deficiency: putting policy into practice and the key role for research. Proc Nutr Soc. (2017) 76:54–63. 10.1017/S0029665116000756 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouillon R. Comparative analysis of nutritional guidelines for vitamin D. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2017) 13:466–79. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.31 - DOI - PubMed