Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;50(12):2474-2487.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001739.

A Dynamic Assessment of Children's Physical Competence: The Dragon Challenge

Richard Tyler  1 , Lawrence Foweather  2 , Kelly A Mackintosh  1 , Gareth Stratton  1
Affiliations

A Dynamic Assessment of Children's Physical Competence: The Dragon Challenge

Richard Tyler et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The first aim was to develop a dynamic measure of physical competence that requires a participant to demonstrate fundamental, combined and complex movement skills, and assessors to score both processes and products (Dragon Challenge [DC]). The second aim was to assess the psychometric properties of the DC in 10- to 14-yr-old children.

Methods: The first phase involved the development of the DC, including the review process that established face and content validity. The second phase used DC surveillance data (n = 4355; 10-12 yr) to investigate construct validity. In the final phase, a convenience sample (n = 50; 10-14 yr) performed the DC twice (1-wk interval), the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2), and the Stability Skills Assessment (SSA). These data were used to investigate concurrent validity, and test-retest, interrater and intrarater reliabilities.

Results: In support of construct validity, boys (P < 0.001) and secondary school children (P < 0.001) obtained higher DC total scores than girls and primary school children, respectively. A principal component analysis revealed a nine-component solution, with the three criteria scores for each individual DC task loading onto their own distinct component. This nine-factor structure was confirmed using a confirmatory factor analysis. Results for concurrent validity showed that there was a high positive correlation between DC total score and TGMD-2 and SSA overall score (r(43) = 0.86, P < 0.001). DC total score showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.63, 0.90; P < 0.001). Interrater and intrarater reliabilities on all comparison levels was good (all intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.85).

Conclusion: The DC is a valid and reliable tool to measure elements of physical competence in children age 10 to 14 yr.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Factor structure of DC.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • A Critique of the Dragon Challenge.
    St John L, Cairney J. St John L, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Oct;51(10):2180. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002018. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. PMID: 31524817 No abstract available.
  • Response.
    Stratton G, Foweather L, Mackintosh KA, Tyler R. Stratton G, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Oct;51(10):2181. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002019. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. PMID: 31524818 No abstract available.

References

    1. International Physical Literacy Association. Definition of physical literacy. [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2017 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.physical-literacy.org.uk/.
    1. Edwards LC, Bryant AS, Keegan RJ, Morgan K, Jones AM. Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2016;47(1):1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jurbala P. What is physical literacy, really? Quest. 2015;67(4):367–83.
    1. Lundvall S. Physical literacy in the field of physical education—a challenge and a possibility. J Sport Heal Sci. 2015;4(2):113–8.
    1. Corbin CB. Implications of physical literacy for research and practice: a commentary. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(1):14–27. - PubMed

Publication types