Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;367(1):101-107.
doi: 10.1124/jpet.118.250852. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Binding Characteristics of Two Oxytocin Variants and Vasopressin at Oxytocin Receptors from Four Primate Species with Different Social Behavior Patterns

Affiliations

Binding Characteristics of Two Oxytocin Variants and Vasopressin at Oxytocin Receptors from Four Primate Species with Different Social Behavior Patterns

Jack H Taylor et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

A clade of New World monkeys (NWMs) exhibits considerable diversity in both oxytocin (OT) ligand and oxytocin receptor (OTR) structure. Most notable is the variant Pro8-OT, with proline instead of leucine at the eighth position, resulting in a rigid bend in the peptide backbone. A higher proportion of species that express Pro8-OT also engage in biparental care and social monogamy. When marmosets (genus Callithrix), a biparental and monogamous Pro8-OT NWM species, are administered the ancestral Leu8-OT, there is no change in social behavior compared with saline treatment. However, when Pro8-OT is administered, marmosets' sociosexual and prosocial behaviors are altered. The studies here tested the hypothesis that OTR binding affinities and OT-induced intracellular Ca2+ potencies would favor the native OT ligand in OTRs from four primate species, each representing a unique combination of ancestral lineage, breeding system, and native OT ligand: humans (Leu8-OT, monogamous, apes), macaques (Leu8-OT, nonmonogamous, Old World monkey), marmosets (Pro8-OT, monogamous, NWM), and titi monkeys (Leu8-OT, monogamous, NWM). OTRs were expressed in immortalized Chinese hamster ovary cells and tested for intact-cell binding affinities for Pro8-OT, Leu8-OT, and arginine vasopressin (AVP), as well as intracellular Ca2+ signaling after stimulation with Pro8-OT, Leu8-OT, and AVP. Contrary to our hypothesis, Pro8-OT bound at modestly higher affinities and stimulated calcium signaling at modestly higher potencies compared with Leu8-OT in all four primate OTRs. Thus, differences downstream from a ligand-receptor binding event are more likely to explain the different behavioral responses to these two ligands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Representative saturation assays for 125I-OVTA binding to OTRs from each of the four species. Cells on 96-well plates were incubated on ice in 50 µl binding medium with the indicated concentrations of 125I-OVTA for 3 hours, and specific binding was then quantified. Data are from a single experiment with all four receptors tested side by side in triplicate. Values for this experiment are in good agreement with the average values in the Results and Table 1: humans, Bmax = 9.7 fmol/well and Kd = 0.12 nM; macaques, Bmax = 6.9 fmol/well and Kd = 0.144 nM; marmosets (R10), Bmax = 34 fmol/well and Kd = 0.30 nM; and titi monkeys, Bmax = 30 fmol/well and Kd = 0.24 nM.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Competition curves for Pro8-OT and Leu8-OT for each primate species OTR. Increasing concentrations of competitor ligand (Pro8-OT, Leu8-OT, or AVP) were added to a constant concentration of 125I-OVTA in intact CHO cells expressing one of four primate OTRs. All values are expressed as the percentage of the maximal binding in the absence of OT or AVP.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Intracellular Ca2+ increases for each primate species OTR. Increasing concentrations of Pro8,-OT, Leu8-OT, or AVP were used to stimulate intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in CHO cells expressing one of four primate OTRs. All values are expressed as the percentage of the maximal response to 10−6 M Leu8-OT for each species.

References

    1. Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH. (2013) Sniffing around oxytocin: review and meta-analyses of trials in healthy and clinical groups with implications for pharmacotherapy. Transl Psychiatry 3:e258. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beets I, Temmerman L, Janssen T, Schoofs L. (2013) Ancient neuromodulation by vasopressin/oxytocin-related peptides. Worm 2:e24246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brewster AIR, Hruby VJ, Glasel JA, Tonelli AE. (1973) Proposed conformations of oxytocin and selected analogs in dimethyl sulfoxide as deduced from proton magnetic resonance studies. Biochemistry 12:5294–5304. - PubMed
    1. Busnelli M, Bulgheroni E, Manning M, Kleinau G, Chini B. (2013) Selective and potent agonists and antagonists for investigating the role of mouse oxytocin receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 346:318–327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busnelli M, Saulière A, Manning M, Bouvier M, Galés C, Chini B. (2012) Functional selective oxytocin-derived agonists discriminate between individual G protein family subtypes. J Biol Chem 287:3617–3629. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources