Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;23(12):1494-1499.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0003. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Premature Clinical Trial Discontinuation in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Affiliations

Premature Clinical Trial Discontinuation in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Monica Khunger et al. Oncologist. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Clinical trial completion is critical for new cancer therapies. Premature trial termination or withdrawal is common and impairs progress. We assessed factors of early terminated/withdrawn oncology trials focusing on trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), hypothesizing that the latter may be associated with lower rates of premature discontinuation.

Materials and methods: We reviewed all adult, intervention, oncology trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (November 16, 2011, to April 16, 2015) to identify all terminated/withdrawn trials and reasons for termination. Logistics regression model was used to identify factors associated with early termination/withdrawal. Discontinuation rate was compared in trials with and without ICI.

Results: We identified 12,875 trials (35% industry funded, 12% federal funded), of which 8.5% were prematurely terminated (5%) or withdrawn (3.5%); the main reasons were poor accrual (33%) and logistical (24%). ICI trials (n = 350) had a nonsignificant lower rate of termination or withdrawal compared with all other oncology trials (5.4% vs. 8.5%; p = .9) and were less likely to discontinue due to poor accrual (nonsignificant difference: 21% vs. 33%; p = .4). ICI trials were also less likely to discontinue compared with all other oncology drug trials (e.g., chemotherapy, targeted inhibitors, antiangiogenesis, biologics; 5.4% vs. 7.9%, respectively, nonsignificant difference). The 4-year cumulative incidence of failing to complete for reasons unrelated to toxicity or efficacy was 18% (95% confidence interval 16%-20%). There was no association between annual incidence across different tumor types or accrual goal and rate of trial termination.

Conclusion: Poor accrual represents the main cause of early cancer trial termination. Premature termination/withdrawal rate was not significantly lower in ICI compared with other trials. Clinical trial completion remains a high priority and can be influenced by provider and patient factors.

Implications for practice: Clinical trial completion is critical for new cancer therapies. Premature trial termination or withdrawal is common and impairs progress. This study assessed factors of early terminated/withdrawn oncology trials, focusing on trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and found that poor accrual represents the main cause of early cancer trial termination. Premature termination/withdrawal rate was not significantly lower in immune checkpoint inhibitor trials compared to other trials. The discussion herein is focused on measures taken by the National Cancer Institute and other institutions to improve clinical trial accrual and prevent premature clinical trial discontinuation.

Keywords: Cancer; Clinical research; Clinical trial termination; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ClinicalTrials.gov search strategy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Recruitment status of all cancer clinical trials and ICI trials. Abbreviation: ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Reasons for early termination/withdrawal. Abbreviation: ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cumulative incidence of clinical trial premature termination/withdrawal for any reason (unrelated to toxicity or lack of efficacy).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Cumulative incidence of trials failing to complete due to poor accrual.

References

    1. Carlisle B, Kimmelman J, Ramsay T et al. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: An empirical analysis of recently closed trials. Clin Trials 2015;12:77–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng SK, Dietrich MS, Dilts DM. A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI‐CTEP) sponsored studies. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:5557–5563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: Race‐, sex‐, and age‐based disparities. JAMA 2004;291:2720–2726. - PubMed
    1. Comis RL, Miller JD, Aldige CR et al. Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. JClin Oncol 2003;21:830–835. - PubMed
    1. Langford AT, Resnicow K, Dimond EP et al. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical trial enrollment, refusal rates, ineligibility, and reasons for decline among patients at sites in the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program. Cancer 2014;120:877–884. - PMC - PubMed